"The crises of ancient Israel, however, birthed a form of piety that allowed devotion to only one deity, who could not be given a worldly image. All others were rejected. Yet further crises led Israel to deny that any other deities than Yahweh even existed. Their world became disenchanted." 10
Trauma is a catch word. But just because it is being co-opted and used willy-nilly these days doesnt mean that books about trauma should be discounted. If written by highly informed or well grounded therapists or theologians, it is good and maybe even essential to listen to their explorations.
Carr's book is a step into a "trauma informed" perspective on the bible. If we grant that it is an interesting experiment to take significant themes in trauma therapy/theory and apply them to a book that is filled with traumas and was written, in many cases, by traumatized monotheist people (OT) or early Jesus followers; what do you find?
Well, i found that it shades the historical-critical work with another hermeneutical lens. I think this is probably speculative because who knows how the jewish captives in Babylon would be traumatized in the same way that modern north american people are traumatized? It is a radically different social situation. But it is helpful to be reminded that the Bible is written by people who suffered and for Christians, the suffering became a central part of understanding the incarnation of God in his Son as suffering WITH humanity and on behalf of humanity. To of the main historical events that caused deep communal trauma were three fold: in 720 BCE the 10 tribes of israel exiled by the Assyrians, in 586 the Babylonians destruction of Jerusalem and the temple and the 70ad Roman decimation of Jerusalem.
So utilizing trauma theory seems to fit as a helpful tool for seeing the texts of Scripture in a new light. Not radically new, because suffering and theodicy are common themes in biblical theology.
I enjoyed the book and especially Carr's unpacking of the reality of ancient Israel's experiences of deportation and re-settlement in Babylon. The history of the multiple traumas experienced was fascinating for understand the specific shape of Christianity. Also Carr's short breakdown of the developmental history of PTSD was helpful (see appendix).
Quotes:
“The cross is no sign of humiliating defeat for Christians. Instead, it is a proud symbol of movement membership. Jesus’ followers did not end up fleeing from the reality of his crucifixion, but “took up the cross” themselves. Such a thing would have been incomprehensible to Romans. It is an excellent example of the adaptability of symbols, especially in cases like imperial domination, where a dominated group confronts symbolic actions imposed on it by its oppressor." 162