What do you think?
Rate this book


133 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1993
She speaks of tomorrow as a definite location, as if she could go to its door any time, turn the knob and walk into tomorrow. [...] Yet despite her sureness, the air in the passage that leads to tomorrow occasionally thickens. She has to push to get through it. A concentration accumulates around her as the present thickens and blocks out tomorrow.Initial shock of the disjointed text like a cold shower transitions to the slow sinking into a thick mud bath of mysterious disorientation.
A meticulous voice, a dry, closed circuit, moves like a shadow into the foreground. A shadow is merely some shade in transit, a plane of parallel, unconnected, absent light. His voice is merely sound in transit moving steadily over old tracks.Events within an ambiguous relationship between a nameless man and woman transpire in an unknown tropical country. He was ill, now recovered. She aided in his recovery. His attempts to leave are thwarted. These are memories or not...it is unclear. Maybe some are dreams. Characters exist on the periphery: a chemist and his late wife, a young man in a bar, and others even more obscured. Tipped into the text are excerpts read aloud from a dated book on management of native servants. Repetition of phrases, reconception of scenes from different perspectives unspool tentative narrative threads of a gossamer nature.
Dreams. Do you know what dreams are? Life covered over with common black cloth so thin it seems transparent.The book strikes an elusive balance between total disorientation and incomplete comprehension. As a reader it is the perfect place for my mind to dwell. After a few introductory chapters of relative abstraction, the novel maintains this vague liminal state where enough intrigue leaks from pinholes made in a shroud of uncertainty until the very end. Influence of the nouveau roman seeps through via Robbe-Grillet and Duras, as well as a kinship with Kavan. Yet it remains wholly original in its inscrutability, offering up only this fragment of self-description in its closing:
Repetition, double voices, interpretation is impossible.