I've read one other novel by David Baldacci, Divine Justice, one of the Camel Club novels. This was a much better book. Browsing reviews of this book by other readers I get the impression that there are elements of this novel that are common to some of his other books as well. I can understand why that might well be annoying to readers who have read lots of an author's novels. But as someone who is dealing with just this one novel, I'm going to talk mostly just about this book.
I liked it an awful lot, much more than I liked the other novel. This book, dealing with the Supreme Court and the justice system in general, had a much more substantive feel to it than the other novel.
This had the feel of a book that the author cared passionately about. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that Baldacci is concerned about the Supreme Court, its reputation, the tenor of its rulings, and the way the court works vis a vis the cases it takes up, the de-facto negotiation among factions within the court, etc.
I'm not going to talk very much about the plot of the novel, simply because there are already so very many reviews in Goodreads that do that. I'll just say that what makes this, to my mind at least, a book far superior to Divine Justice is a combination of well drawn characters and a plot that is at once personal in its effect on the most important characters and also has big-picture range, exploring the aspects of the high court's function as discussed above. Also, it doesn't stint when it comes to secondary characters. There is a nice balance in the way characters are treated in this novel, with almost all of the minor characters coming alive on the page.
I won't say it's easy, but it is far easier for a writer to make the protagonist and a couple of other key characters seem fairly real. But in this novel, Baldacci goes well beyond that first tier of characters to create a cast of characters that feels like a bunch of people we might actually know. The one character who I felt was not quite made whole was, unfortunately, the young woman, a clerk at the high court, who was involved with another clerk . . . until shortly before that other clerk is murdered. She is not badly drawn, but she is, to my mind, the least seriously considered character who really matters here. She's a little too good. She is flawed, but in a way that it's hard to criticize. She's looking for Mr. Right . . . and it turns out that the damaged brother of her former lover, who she has never really met before the book opens, is that man. She's seen him in action in court, and on the basis of that experience, she has fallen in love with him . . . or is predisposed to do so. I say that because she expresses that thought before she formally meets him in the novel.
Obviously, people do fall in love at first sight sometimes. But having her fall in love from afar with her lover's brother is a pretty twisted bit of psychodrama. And I didn't feel Baldacci really gave the problematic dynamics of that as much attention as it deserved. But otherwise, I thought this was a very well done, tightly suspenseful and well choreographed thriller. It had me worried for the people he wanted me to be worried about, till almost the very end. The end was a little predictable, but I didn't think it was nearly as predictable as some readers seem to have felt. The suspense was there for me up until very close to the end. The fact that the some of what happened at the end was not a big surprise was not nearly serious enough to diminish my enjoyment of the novel
Generally, very well done, Baldacci!