I almost never rate a book with a "1," because when a book fails to engage me this badly, I stop reading it. But my brand-new book club chose Girl With Dove as our very first book, based on a recommendation in The Guardian, and so I forced through to the end. In short, this book almost killed our new book club (so few people read the book, we cancelled our meeting twice). So here is my caveat emptor: Girl With Dove is not the book it purports to be.
I *think* that the author, Sally Bayley, had an interesting, challenging, ultimately very brave childhood. I *think* that she grew up in an eccentric, dysfunctional home with at least 10 other children and numerous Jesus Freak types who wandered through. I *think* her baby brother disappeared, and that a murder was committed in her house, and that she herself suffered from either anorexia or self-harm, or both, and that by reporting her home life to Social Services, she saved herself. I *think* these things, because this is what the book jacket tells me. But the book itself, for all 266 pages, seems to be doing all it can to avoid or skirt around these characters and these events.
Reading Girl With Dove, I felt like a therapist trying to get a trauma survivor to verbalize what she'd been through -- while every time, rather than telling her own story she told me a story about someone else. Don't get me wrong: No trauma victim should be forced to tell their story. And honestly, that is what this book read like to me: a primary document of trauma.
The book jacket (and the recommendation in The Guardian) both echo the book's subtitle: that this was a life "built by books." But rather than reflecting on her own relationship to reading and the psychological and emotional resources books provided her, Bayley mostly summarizes various plots. We get substantial chunks of Jayne Eyre, David Copperfield, and Agatha Christie novels -- summarized. We even get an episode from the TV show Dallas. Again, summarized, not analyzed, not interwoven into Bayley's own emotional journey. Rather, the plot summaries seem to intrude just when Bayley had reached the point in her own narrative where something interesting (or scary, or awful) is about to happen to her. She stops her own story and fills in with the plot from a novel instead.
The book is full of such deflections. Surely there are fascinating characters here; when Bayley does let herself go and writes a fully fleshed out scene or her home life (or, in one instance, of her life at the Lowood-like school she attended after leaving home), the writing starts to sing, and you catch a glimpse of the sharp, vivid, emotionally penetrating book this could have been. But too often, when action does happen in Girl With Dove -- action from Bayley's life, I mean: not the life of a fictional character -- it is so shrouded by very high, abstruse language, you see it only (see it dimly) through a fog of poetry and allusion.
My overall impression after reading Girl With Dove is that the author did not really want to tell this story -- perhaps to protect her surviving family members, perhaps to protect her own psyche. These are completely understandable and honorable reasons, and (again) no one should be forced to tell a story that is too painful to tell. But here it is: we have this book, Girl With Dove. It's been written. To what end, or for what purpose, I'm not sure. To read Bayley's bio on book jackets or in reviews is to understand and and deeply admire that hers is a story of survival. Girl With Dove, on the other hand, reveals so little of the author's actual life -- both the external and the internal -- that, in these pages, it's hardly there.