My rating: 3.5 stars, rounded down to 3 stars.
Stephanie Laurens is a talented writer, so I was surprised to find this book a bit boring at times. It just seemed to move slowly, and the two main characters seemed to have repetitive thoughts and behavior. I suspect the book moved slowly because the danger to Jacqueline didn't really become obvious until near the end of the book, so there wasn't a lot of action before that. There was a lot of them visiting the Nimway Hall farms and tenants, which just got boring after a while.
I liked Richard, and liked that he wasn't bothered by Jacqueline's independence and intelligence, or the fact that she had inherited Nimway Hall (instead of a man!). Most men of that time period would have been totally turned off by a strong-willed, intelligent woman like Jacqueline, but not Richard. He actually realized that her strength and intelligence made her more desirable.
I liked Jacqueline, too, but thought she and Richard needed to communicate better. He didn't trust women, because of a gold-digger in his past -- and she didn't trust men, because they only wanted to take control of her inherited lands. If they had just talked, they both would have realized they had nothing to fear from each other.
Since Laurens' books usually contain quite a bit of sex, I was surprised that this book only contained one sex scene -- and it wasn't really all that explicit.
I liked many of the secondary characters in the book, especially the others at Nimway Hall, who realized right away that Richard was perfect for Jacqueline.
My rating system is below.
1 star -- Hated it, or did not finish. I usually only give this rating if some of the content is truly objectionable to me, like if one of the main characters does something really awful, and gets away with it.
2 stars -- Didn't like it. This rating usually means that I thought the writing wasn't very good, the editing was terrible, I didn't like the characters, or it had other major flaws.
3 stars -- I liked it, but had some minor issues with it. This rating means that there were minor editing issues, the story needed more character development, it was just too unrealistic, or had some other fairly minor issue. The majority of books I read get this rating – I do not consider it a bad rating.
4 stars -- I liked it a lot. This is a high rating for me, and I rarely give a higher one.
5 stars -- I loved it, and will probably read it again. Very few books are good enough to get this rating from me. The ones that do are usually classics.