i had been taking a break from romance books cause they can seriously be irritating at times.i was in the mood to start them again,and i pick up this thing.it makes me want to stop reading them again.
ive never seen a book centered around..the deed.i mean,obviously its in romance books,but to name your book after it..
who would ask a king to make their husband consummate the wedding? u'd never go to your king for that. or anyone for that matter. geez! &u'd never talk about consummation in front of people.
im sure these naive characters are meant to be charming,but they come off as ignorant and stupid.
there's quite a few historical innacuricies in here,like "tipsy" or "slept with her"
"at any rate" and "had most likely been the clincher."
there were quite a few places where a sentence needed a comma,and there wasnt one.
emma said she was two and twenty,and almost at the end of her childbearing years, which i took to mean forty yrs old,and yet she acted like a child.and an ignorant one at that.&then amaury said she was young,so im confused about her age.
i understand ppl during that time were naive about marriage but this is ridiculous.&if she was forty, then she should have known a little more about it.
i thought judith mcnaughts character saying "why do we have to share a bed" or "why do we have to be in the same room" was bad,but this character takes the cake.
i thought emma had realized when talking to the king that her 1st marriage was never consummated, but she still thought it had been after,just because they slept in the same bed.
i didnt find it amusing in the least.
amaury-great name btw-not!-said he never bedded virgins,because being an illegitimate child,he didnt wanna bring other illegitmate children into the world,so he only bedded wenches.now correct me if im wrong,but you can still have illegitimate children with wenches.just a lil heads up there. i mean, how did the author not realize that?!
no lady during that time would have been comfortable disrobing and walking around naked in front of a man with no reservations at all.even sum1 as stupid as emma should have known that.
no romance author has ever talked about the mans..manhood..like this author did.shrunken. shriveled. tiny.resembled a girls deformed arm that was missing fingers.
WHY should that ever enter a romance book?
ive read some truly naive characters before,but like i said,this one takes the cake.she thought his..manhood was a third leg.that whole thing brought gross images to my mind and i didnt find any of it even remotely funny.it actually bordered on disgusting.
who wants to be caught in the act by like thirty ppl? i mean seriously! &then amuary is standing naked in front of everyone and no one even seems to care.they act like its completely normal that he should be standing there naked.&then the way they find out that the marriage is consummated is the blood on his..3rd leg.&btw,emma thinks it's a 3rd leg.
none of that was romantic or funny.it was disgusting.&highly unbelievable.
ive never read about women getting drunk with the men and then found in the Great Hall the next morning.in fact,ive never heard of everyone in the castle getting drunk.
amaury coming to the castle and saying everything was his,like his castle,his great hall,was annoying.
after amaury saying is isnt the guy that hurts during..the deed, and the fact that she was the one in pain when they..did the deed,she thinks he's hurt when she sees blood on him and is like he must have hurt himself.idk how this could ever pass for humor or who would think its even remotely funny.
i also found it disgusting that everyone slept with every1 in the great hall.
of course emma the idiot would think that when blake said amuary was a bas**** that he meant it as an insult when he just meant that he was illegitimate.blake is amaury's friend.why would she think he'd call him a bas****?! oh yeah,because emma is a freakin idiot.
i didnt understand the big deal with ppl knowing that emma shot those men with arrows.i understand her 1st husband was horrified 2 learn she used a bow,but who cares if ppl know?
if bandits were known throughout the woods,then why would those two grown men want to kill Rolfe when he was a mere child at the time,just for having seen them in the woods?this isnt modern times when the kid could have reported their description and brought the police to track them down.
the way this book is written is designed to get on a person's nerves.
like he said that his wife was trying to poision him,not seriously at all.he just said it because the stuff tasted bad.&this guy comes out of nowhere and stops her.who would think amaury had been serious?!
some of the speech in here is completely backwards.like "do i say that you are tired, then you are."
emma constantly called him "husband" or "my lord husband" which just grated on my already raw nerves. it was seriously annoying.
romance authors always say the girl is headstrong and strongwilled,but rarely back that statement up. this one isnt strongwilled at all.every time amaury bossed her around,all emma would do was narrow her eyes,and wouldnt even say anything.
some of the things in here were a little modern for that time period,like "building up her self esteem" and "some women like to talk before..the deed."
amaury was always grunting or scowling.he came off as a grouchy, crotchety old man.he wasnt likeable at all.and was actually really annoying.as was emma.
emma's blend of ignorance and knowledge didnt work at all.she was completely and totally ignorant of what went on between a man and woman.and yet told her husband that her woman's time had come and gone so they could..proceed with their marriage duties.how would she know that you couldnt get together when its that of the month when she didnt know anything else concerning marriage?!
of course you expect naive characters in historical romance novels,because that's how women were during that time,but this one is just ridiculous.ive never read about another character this bad and i never want to again.it wasnt that she didnt know anything about marriage,its the fact that she thought she did,and then made up stuff in her head that she thought was logical.like that he had a third leg.wth is all i can say on that one.
emma was also constantly fretting and worrying over her husband.every time he grimaced or look disgruntled,she was all over him asking if he was alright.
her husband and his friend are sitting there talking about her probably having gas.as if that isnt gross.none of the crap in this book should ever be in a book! &why would appearing to be drunk ever make someone think she's got gas?
i just cant believe ive read the things ive read in here.
some of the speech in here is just plain wrong,and i dont think anyone talked like that in any time period.like "we needs must."
&no lady talked about the marriage duties right out like emma did.
&every time someone tried to explain the truth about consummation to the d.a. emma, something would interrupt them.&the naive twit would go on believing these ridiculous things she had dreamed up in her own stupid head. it was seriously ticking me off.&i started to think she'd never fully understand it.
in the beginning of the book it says that amuary was wearing a hose(tights) and that he looked formidable. as if anyone could look formidable with hose on.
emma finally came to the conclusion that all men must have them,so i thought the whole "oddity" and "3rd leg" thing was over,but she called it that again. this book is seriously trying my patience.
i was surprised to read when amaury said women werent supposed to enjoy..it.&that wives werent supposed to enjoy the marriage act.why just wives? i mean,amaury has been with a lot of women, so shouldnt he know better? the d.a.-ness must be rubbing off onto him.
the ignorances just kept coming in the book.&i feared they'd never end.
things are happening towards the beginning of the book that usually happen towards the end in a historical romance book.like when the guy gets possesive or w/e towards the girl.it happened a lil fast in here.
then when emma is responding to amaury's touch,he gets disgruntled-surprise there-and then ends up stopping altogether because "ladies were not supposed to enjoy the bedding." usually in a book, the guy is happy that the girl is responding to him like that.why are the ppl in here so dang stupid?! &who told amaury women arent supposed to enjoy the bedding? 1st its just women,then its wives, and now hes back to saying women arent supposed to enjoy it.so its like if one responds to you, you should stop because that means somethings wrong with her? wth?!
someone who didnt know about the marraige act at all knew that she could mount the guy like a horse.did the author seriously think we would buy this crap?!
let me get this straight.because some fool had told him women werent supposed to enjoy it, and the fool amuary had believed it,he wanted a wife who didnt respond at all,who just layed there, rather than one who responded to his touch? wut kinda sense does that make? you could halfway pull it off if the guy was a virgin too,but apparently he'd been with a lot of women before.so why is he that stupid? you mean to tell us that the wenches didnt respond at all? did this issue apply to the wenches he was with? cause he sed he'd nvr been with a virgin b4.which made me think he didnt because they were inexperienced,and becuz the idiot thought they were the only ones that could get pregnant.so wouldnt he be happy to have a wife who was..responsive?
i seriously want to talk to this author and try to better understand wth she was thinking when she wrote this.
im so sick of trying to put together the many pieces that are wrong with this book.i feel like i could sit here all day and it still wouldnt make sense. which leads me to believe that this author doesnt know wut the heck she's writing about.
i had to stop reading almost 200 pgs in for my sanity.
i skipped to the last chapter and found that they were both still the same way they were at the beginning,the same grumbling,growling, irritated, naive, ignorant fools.despite the fact that characters are supposed to progess in some way during a book.
emma thought sumthin was wrong with her to enjoy her husband's touch and it seemed like amaury hadnt fully realized that it was ok for women to enjoy it.
idk if emma finally figured out the whole marriage thing or the basic concept of the marriage thing or that his manhood wasnt an extra limb and i dont care.
neither one of those characters were likeable.in fact,i didnt particularly care for ne1 in here.
this author needs to figure out what's actually funny and what's annoying. ie,everything in here. i dont care if i ever pick up a book by her again.
&btw,her pic in the back of the book is creepy.
i just wanna put this whole thing behind me and hope to forget about it.but something tells me i wont ever forget this.
..third leg.oddity.shriveled.shrunken.tiny.oh,geez.