Mark Husbands and Daniel J. Treier gather notable evangelical scholars and teachers to address key questions from biblical, historical, theological and ecumenical perspectives. Key questions addressed include: Does the doctrine of imputation of Christ's righteousness need to be rethought, or does it faithfully reflect biblical teaching? How should the faith and transformation of the believer be understood in connection with our justification? What is the connection between our union with Christ and justification? What can we learn from Lutheran, Wesleyan and Anglican perspectives on justification? What does the Lutheran-Catholic Joint Declaration of 1999 contribute to current ecumenical discussions, and what prospects are there for real theological and ecclesiological reconciliation?
An intriguing exploration in to the topic of justification that is readily complimentary to Wright's latest work on the topic. It moves through the important facets of the conversation through a series of four essays (biblical, historical, theological and ecumenical) by asking, what is at stake? There is a conversation happening today about the implications of challenging the common reformed notion of imputed righteousness, and although critics like Piper contend that what is being challenged is to great a tradition, the common mantra that reform is always necessary remains is perhaps a necessary one even in light of the caution. There are great arguments for the need of change, and within the confines of this book, change may be one way to bring a greater unity between the Catholic and Protestant Church. A welcome though indeed.
Good collection of essays about the current state of Justification within Protestant theology. Essays are in four parts dealing with (1) biblical theology, (2) dogmatics, (3) historical theology, and (4) ecumenical considerations