What do you think?
Rate this book
Neither Oldest Nor Best
This book provides powerful evidence that Codex Sinaiticus was actually produced in 1840 and that Codex Vaticanus is no older than the medieval era, with modifications likely made in the 19th century. Dr. David Sorenson presents compelling evidence that most modern Bible versions are based upon manuscripts which are fraudulent in their provenance. This book is powerful vindication of the King James Version. "Explosive, well researched and documented" Randall King, D. Min. "Devastating evidence and pentrating common sense analysis . . . a must read." Dell Johnson, Ph.D., Th.D.
Hardcover
Published January 1, 2017
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
February 4, 2020
Jaw-dropping. Astounding. Disturbing. This book documents the drama surrounding the two “oldest and most reliable” manuscripts of the Bible. (Mostly Siniaticus). The author cites his work. I stand aghast at the “scholars” embracing of such documents. Thank you for sharing this. Remember, Satan is a liar.
September 24, 2025
I was astounded at the amount of narrative evidence provided for the discussion of the age of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. As it turns out, the events surrounding the publishing of Aleph were quite colorful and intriguing--there was much conspiracy surrounding it.
After reading the book, I am pretty strongly convinced that MSS Aleph and B are not ancient whatsoever, and I feel Sorenson presented plenty of evidence in support of his claims. I think anyone curious about the validity of modern versions/the "ancient" MSS should pick up this book. It's a very quick and easy read.
The author was passionate about the subject at hand, albeit a little too passionate. I didn't appreciate how intensely he phrased some of his statements, as it may be a point of contention for his book. It probably would have been better to just present the evidence with a matter-of-fact tone, and then present the appropriate interpretation.
There were a handful of spelling/grammatical errors which were disappointing given the purpose and seriousness of the discussion.
Overall, I would highly recommend this to other readers who want to hear more of the discussion on the antiquity and veracity of Aleph and B as foundational biblical manuscripts.
After reading the book, I am pretty strongly convinced that MSS Aleph and B are not ancient whatsoever, and I feel Sorenson presented plenty of evidence in support of his claims. I think anyone curious about the validity of modern versions/the "ancient" MSS should pick up this book. It's a very quick and easy read.
The author was passionate about the subject at hand, albeit a little too passionate. I didn't appreciate how intensely he phrased some of his statements, as it may be a point of contention for his book. It probably would have been better to just present the evidence with a matter-of-fact tone, and then present the appropriate interpretation.
There were a handful of spelling/grammatical errors which were disappointing given the purpose and seriousness of the discussion.
Overall, I would highly recommend this to other readers who want to hear more of the discussion on the antiquity and veracity of Aleph and B as foundational biblical manuscripts.
June 17, 2022
Well researched, and clearly explained. I knew some of the facts surrounding the unreliability of Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, but Dr. Sorenson presents more evidence than one could ever wish for, and presents it in a clear and concise way. Made me cling tighter to my old trusty KJB.
January 1, 2019
Fairly well written. Presents the argument that Simonides forged Codex Sinaiticus and that it is not one of the oldest and best manuscripts.
February 23, 2022
Not overly deep, but a solid case against the critical text. Very informative in a way that was easy to understand
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews