What do you think?
Rate this book


120 pages, Paperback
First published June 21, 2011
“I respect the secrets and magic of nature. That's why it makes me so angry when I see these things that are happening–I really, truly worry. Every second, I hear, the size of a football field is torn down in the Amazon. I mean, that kind of stuff really bothers me. That's why I write these kinds of songs, you know, to give some sense of awareness and awakening and hope to people. I love the Planet. I love the trees. I have this thing for trees–and the colors and the changing of leaves. I love it! And I respect those kinds of things. I really feel that nature is trying so hard to compensate for man's mismanagement of the planet. The planet is sick, like a fever. If we don't fix it now, it's at the point of no return. This is our last chance to fix this problem that we have. It's like a runway train. And the time has come. This Is It. People are always saying, ‘Oh, they'll take care of it, the government will do it.’ ‘They?’ They who? It starts with us. It's us. Or else it'll never be done... We have four years to get it right. After that it would be irreversible. Let's take care of the planet.” -Michael Jackson, This Is It rehearsals, 2009.
“Michael was the lifeline of many. He was the one voice of sanity in a world gripped by so much insanity. For many, he was their hope, their confidante, their role model, their leader or guru.” -Reverend Barbara Kaufmann
“It was clear that the biggest problem for critics was Michael Jackson himself. Since the mid-1980s, the media had developed a simple, but profitable portrait of Jackson that could be cut and pasted into each new story: he was a naive, eccentric, megalomaniac. Reviews of his music are almost universally interpreted through this lens beginning in the late 1980s, regardless of the merits of the song or album. Jackson, they often argued, should stick to the blissful “dance music’ of his early career rather than some of the ‘angry,’ ‘defiant,’ ‘political’ material that followed. Critics always preferred to view Jackson as an entertainer rather than an artist, a stereotype with a long racial history of which Jackson was well aware. As his music became more experimental and challenging, journalists tried in vain to put him ‘back in his place.’ They didn't want to hear songs about racism, media distortion, war and the environment from a pop star, they said. The wanted Off the Wall 2.0.” -Joseph Vogel (p. 60-61)