Not yet finished this novel, so my rating is irrelevant, just a thought on pages 114-15:
‘Walter, blind to how to his favour towards Simon had fanned Edmund’s jealousy, had prayed that the women’s affection would spread to their husbands. Since Constantine’s death, however, he had come to mistrust Edmund’s familiarity with Agnes and urged Ralf to counsel Simon on his duty to govern his wife...whether from faith in Agnes’s innocence or indifference to her guilt, Ralf could not say’
This seems to be a direct allusion to the characters of Arnolphe (Edmund) and Agnès (Agnes) respectively, from Molière’s ‘L’École des femmes’. Aside from the name similarity, the subject matter itself alludes to the ideas within Molière’s text: Arnolphe, not unlike the jealousy of Yahweh in the OT, ‘govern[s]’ his future wife in order to render her incapable of becoming ‘une bête’ and taking part in ‘cocuage’ - cuckoldry. Walter’s suspicions resemble those of Arnolphe: they are afraid their wives will disobey them and, ideologically, afraid of strong and independent women.
REVIEW AFTER COMPLETING BOOK
Wow. I don’t often award 5 stars, but this really deserves it. The wonderful ending, with Frank reminiscing on Botticelli’s ‘Annunciation’ really frames Arditti’s compelling storylines. Although the narratives are all, evidently, linked by the thread of writing/catharsis (through transcribing the destruction of Sodom), Arditti furthers this with denouement, creating a bond between the tales that goes beyond subject matter itself.
Arditti’s epic novel never fails to question the reader’s beliefs, sense of morality, and forces one to think about the relationship between modern-day homophobia and the very foundations of religion – the Old Testament, and more specifically, Yahweh’s destruction of Sodom.