Overall this is a deeply disappointing effort, with the first half amounting to little more than a pedestrian and disjointed run-through of historical events up to the late 1940s and the second section turning into a shockingly biased account of the political machinations that led up to Guyana's independence in 1966.
Many of the chapters were initially written as newspaper articles, and while this means they are at least short and to the point, it also leads to a fair deal of repetition and not much in the way of depth or analysis. Consequently the first half in particular has a school textbook feel to it, with each small essay rarely featuring any nuance or interpretation.
The opening section is, though, at least reasonably unbiased, even if in a largely unsophisticated manner. The second half, by contrast, abandons any pretence of neutrality in favour of a discourse that unremittingly favours the viewpoint of one of Guyana's chief independence-era politicians, Cheddi Jagan, the first premier of the country.
Essentially taking the stance that Jagan was right and everyone else was wrong, the last 250 pages of the book are a staggeringly one-eyed interpretation of events that turned Jagan, at one time the man most likely to lead his country to independence, into an also-ran who had to watch his bitter rival, Forbes Burnham, lead Guyana for its first 20 years.
The bias is not even subtle, and the author's use of language is laughably and transparently prejudiced. Democratically elected opposition parties are 'anti-government forces'; anyone who holds a different viewpoint to Jagan 'refuses to agree' with him, or 'refuses to comply' with his requests, while newspapers are described as 'openly supporting' politicians opposed to Jagan, as if that's some sort of shameful crime.
I hold no brief for either Jagan or Burnham, but the least I expect from a 'history' book is a bit of neutrality so that the reader can make up his or her mind. In this case, no attempt has been made in that direction at all.