“If you believe what you like in the Gospel, and reject what you don't like, it is not the Gospel you believe, but yourself.” - Augustine of Hippo
It’s quite obvious from her book, “Undivided,”that Vicky Beeching believes what she likes in the Bible, and rejects (explains away) what she doesn’t like. This book is a fascinating, quick reads as Ms. Beeching attempts to accomplish her stated purpose: “Its my attempt,” she writes , “to show that LGBTQ+ people of faith, and same-sex marriage, should be fully affirmed.”
Let me start by saying that Ms. Beeching‘s story is sad and deplorable. She feels she cannot tell anyone that she is attracted to women, she is sexually assaulted while in a theology program at Oxford, her few attempts at telling someone about her struggle end nightmarishly. One wonders how things would have turned out had she revealed herself to someone who had a more compassionate, understanding, pastoral heart when she explained her struggle with same-sex attraction, but this doesn’t happen.
Ms. Beeching’s desire is not to be accepted by the church because she has same-sex attraction—after obvious struggles and mistakes in handling people like her, the church is finally coming around to true care and concern for homosexuals while abiding by biblical standards. People like Dr. Wes Hill (“Washed and Waiting”) have documented their same-sex attraction and chosen the biblical pattern of living in celibacy. This, however, is not what Ms. Beeching desires. She desires to live as a lesbian, have a lesbian wife and/or lover, and be fully affirmed by the church, which of course the church cannot do because this is not biblical.
Some issues with the book:
1. Ms. Beeching is inconsistent. On the one hand she applauds the theologian, Peter Enns when he excoriates the church for the “sin of certainty” about their theological positions. However, when Ms. Beeching explains away the biblical prohibition about living a homosexual lifestyle, she writes: “Now that I was certain of my own theology, it was increasingly hard not to speak up for social justice.” Wait...what? She writes these words with no irony at all. Did she forget that she wrote approvingly of the “sin of certainty” earlier in the book? Apparently so.
2. Ms. Beeching plays very fast and loose with the Bible. She points out—and I understand—that she is not making an exhaustive biblical argument for homosexuality, this is a memoir, with limited space to do that. So far, so good. However, she spends several pages equating a homosexual lifestyle with God’s instruction to Peter that gentiles were welcome in the faith! I am not going to belabor the point here, suffice to say that this passage in Acts is ripped right out of context and used for her own purposes.
3. Ms. Beeching is very dismissive of any attempts to get her to live a life of celibacy, including a very painful discussion with her grandfather who spent his life as a missionary in Africa. I will allow Rosario Butterfield, lesbian, feminist, professor at Syracuse, turned follower of Jesus, to speak to that particular issue. She says: “Our call is not to despair, but to hope in Christ, and to drive a fresh nail into our choice sin every day.” Needless to say, this Ms. Beeching is not the least bit interested in doing.
4. Jesus is (almost) missing. This is weird, but in her discussions of her faith, there is a lot about love, a lot about God, a lot about how God wants her to live a whole, complete, undivided life, but little about Jesus, nothing about repentance, nothing about sacrifice, nothing about her own sin and sinfulness. By the end of the book she has, unsurprisingly, swallowed the whole “liberal” view of the Bible hook, line, and sinker, including wanting to refer to God as “she,” but not doing so because she decided that would be too much for evangelicals.
The sum total is a disheartening book that ends up right where you suspect it will go. Is it any wonder that she “discovers” in scripture that a homosexual lifestyle is not only not sinful but a positive good, given the fact that she is a lesbian?
The theologian Millard Erickson once wrote that we should hold our theological views with some humility, because we may be wrong about them. Ms. Beeching subscribes to this same view, but only for those who oppose her views, not for herself. For herself, she is certain. The irony seems to escape her.