What do you think?
Rate this book
The Forgotten History of America: Little-Known Conflicts of Lasting Importance From the Earliest Colonists to the Eve of the Revolution
From the founding of the first permanent European settlement in North America (1565) to the bloody chaos of the British frontier in Pontiac’s War (1763), the vividly written narrative of The Forgotten History of America spans the two centuries of American history before the Revolutionary War.
Today, Americans think of 1776 as the beginning of an era. A nation was born, commencing a story that continues to this day with our own lives. But the War of Independence also marked the end of another era—one in which many nations, Native American and European, had struggled for control of a vast and formidable wilderness. That saga—though separated from us now by a gulf of time that makes it strange, and even alien—was the history out of which our own emerged.
This book returns to the time before our nation was formed, when the clash between America's first peoples and the newcomers from Europe was still new. Focusing on events that are all but forgotten today, author Cormac O’Brien’s masterful storytelling reveals how actors as diverse as Spanish conquistadores, Puritan ministers, Amerindian sachems, mercenary soldiers, and ordinary farmers traded and clashed across a landscape of constant, often violent, change. He tells how these dramatic moments helped to shape the very world around us.
These lesser-known conflicts of the pre-Revolutionary past unveil a world of heroism, brutality, and tenacity. Brought brilliantly to life through O'Brien's expressive narrative and more than 100 archival images, The Forgotten History of America shows us how deep the roots of our own time truly run.
Today, Americans think of 1776 as the beginning of an era. A nation was born, commencing a story that continues to this day with our own lives. But the War of Independence also marked the end of another era—one in which many nations, Native American and European, had struggled for control of a vast and formidable wilderness. That saga—though separated from us now by a gulf of time that makes it strange, and even alien—was the history out of which our own emerged.
This book returns to the time before our nation was formed, when the clash between America's first peoples and the newcomers from Europe was still new. Focusing on events that are all but forgotten today, author Cormac O’Brien’s masterful storytelling reveals how actors as diverse as Spanish conquistadores, Puritan ministers, Amerindian sachems, mercenary soldiers, and ordinary farmers traded and clashed across a landscape of constant, often violent, change. He tells how these dramatic moments helped to shape the very world around us.
These lesser-known conflicts of the pre-Revolutionary past unveil a world of heroism, brutality, and tenacity. Brought brilliantly to life through O'Brien's expressive narrative and more than 100 archival images, The Forgotten History of America shows us how deep the roots of our own time truly run.
304 pages, Hardcover
First published October 1, 2008
102 people are currently reading
241 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 24 of 24 reviews
June 2, 2024
Indians were terrible. Europeans were terrible. Colonists were terrible. All God's chillun suck. (For the record, Asians and Africans were terrible too, but they're off the hook in this book.)
Are you ignorant of American history between the founding of Jamestown (or Plymouth Rock if you're a Yankee) and the American Revolution with the possible exception that you know there's a French and Indian War in there somewhere? Is there a gap in your knowledge between Columbus sailing the ocean blue in fourteen hundred ninety-two and the aforementioned foundings? Such was my dilemma, but this book fixed me right up, and it can do the same for you! I'm pleased to report that some parts were things I had just forgotten, but other incidents were new to me.
Mr. O'Brien gives us 18 of the more violent/tragic episodes in American history before the Revolution, and does so in an easy to read format. He embellishes to make the subject matter more readable like a short story, but discerning eyes can easily pull out the facts. Think of it as "history lite," and if you want more details of what you just read, you can consult the select bibliography in the back which gives you 44 sources he used to get his information. Or you can just do like me and fire up the internet for a few extra, ahem, facts.
Even though this is loaded with violence and horrible deeds by horrible people, or boneheaded maneuvers by well-meaning people that had unintended consequences, I found this quite refreshing because it was honest across the board. There's a lot of whitewashing in history nowadays, and it's been that way for a while. Here's the popular version of the time period in question: All the Indians were a loving, peaceful people spread throughout the Americas, just minding their own business, living in harmony with each other and nature, painting with the Colors of the Wind when one day, along came the Europeans who commenced to slaughter them like Sauron on the slopes of Mount Doom.
This continued through the centuries as we pushed and beat these gentle souls across the continent, and on top of that, they also had to suffer the indignity of us lying about how they were being mean to us! And if these environmentally friendly, benign people ever did get up enough gumption to attack us, well, by-golly, we had it coming! This is all poppycock. (Except the bit about us having it coming; we asked for what we ended up getting, but so did the Indians. Eye for an eye, and now we're all blind.) I remember a bit of surprise I received when I toured the Cahokia Mounds and found that the city had a jail. I had been so brainwashed by the tripe above that the idea that there was such a thing as a pre-Columbian Indian criminal had never occurred to me. (I could still be rather naive even at age 25). But once I thought about it for a minute, it all made perfect sense because it's logical. The Indians suffer from the human-condition just like every other race or demographic, though it may manifest itself in different ways, and their moniker of "savage" was well earned.
In the section where 22-year-old noob George Washington kind of accidentally starts the first real World War (The Seven Years War which spanned five continents to greater and lesser degrees and was called The French and Indian War in the North American theater), we have this incident which serves as the comparable Archduke Ferdinand moment. Washington has captured some French soldiers who had surrendered (insert the obligatory joke here) after a brief skirmish. Their leader is one Joseph Coulon de Villiers de Jumonville who was from a family of some importance across the foam. Suddenly one of Washington's Indian allies, Tanaghrisson (the Half King)
In 1637 Massachusetts, various Indian tribes had alliances with various colonial villages from various European nationalities, but not all of them got along, and some retaliatory killings were taking place between the Dutch and the Pequots. Since one European looked just like another to an Indian and vice versa, the Pequots killed a random trader named John Stone. However, John wasn't Dutch, he was English. This would be a costly oops. "Though widely considered a cad and a scoundrel throughout New England, Stone became a rallying cry - evidence of how unscrupulous the English could be when searching for a convenient cause celebre." Negotiations immediately went nowhere, and the Puritans figured it was time to bring the reckoning to these godless, demon worshipers, and it was on.
Given the Indians' barbarity, one wonders how Europeans ever had a chance of gaining a foothold on the continent, but conditions had been inadvertently primed for them by Columbus and friends when they brought with them a host of diseases against which the Indians had no immunity.
Slavery was also discussed in this, but it took a backseat to the wars and other conflicts. There was one line in here about it that amused me, though. George Chicken, a commander during the Yemassee War in South Carolina, had a mixed crew of white militia and black slaves who were waiting to ambush some approaching Indians. "We may never know whether they understood the greater absurdity of this moment: that Englishmen, thousands of miles from their homeland, found themselves defending a hostile wilderness they had taken from somebody else with soldiers they'd stolen from another continent - and led by a man named 'Chicken.'"
This is just a sample of the fun facts you can find in this book, and I don't want to give everything away, so check it out if you like what you've seen so far.
Are you ignorant of American history between the founding of Jamestown (or Plymouth Rock if you're a Yankee) and the American Revolution with the possible exception that you know there's a French and Indian War in there somewhere? Is there a gap in your knowledge between Columbus sailing the ocean blue in fourteen hundred ninety-two and the aforementioned foundings? Such was my dilemma, but this book fixed me right up, and it can do the same for you! I'm pleased to report that some parts were things I had just forgotten, but other incidents were new to me.
Mr. O'Brien gives us 18 of the more violent/tragic episodes in American history before the Revolution, and does so in an easy to read format. He embellishes to make the subject matter more readable like a short story, but discerning eyes can easily pull out the facts. Think of it as "history lite," and if you want more details of what you just read, you can consult the select bibliography in the back which gives you 44 sources he used to get his information. Or you can just do like me and fire up the internet for a few extra, ahem, facts.
Even though this is loaded with violence and horrible deeds by horrible people, or boneheaded maneuvers by well-meaning people that had unintended consequences, I found this quite refreshing because it was honest across the board. There's a lot of whitewashing in history nowadays, and it's been that way for a while. Here's the popular version of the time period in question: All the Indians were a loving, peaceful people spread throughout the Americas, just minding their own business, living in harmony with each other and nature, painting with the Colors of the Wind when one day, along came the Europeans who commenced to slaughter them like Sauron on the slopes of Mount Doom.
This continued through the centuries as we pushed and beat these gentle souls across the continent, and on top of that, they also had to suffer the indignity of us lying about how they were being mean to us! And if these environmentally friendly, benign people ever did get up enough gumption to attack us, well, by-golly, we had it coming! This is all poppycock. (Except the bit about us having it coming; we asked for what we ended up getting, but so did the Indians. Eye for an eye, and now we're all blind.) I remember a bit of surprise I received when I toured the Cahokia Mounds and found that the city had a jail. I had been so brainwashed by the tripe above that the idea that there was such a thing as a pre-Columbian Indian criminal had never occurred to me. (I could still be rather naive even at age 25). But once I thought about it for a minute, it all made perfect sense because it's logical. The Indians suffer from the human-condition just like every other race or demographic, though it may manifest itself in different ways, and their moniker of "savage" was well earned.
In the section where 22-year-old noob George Washington kind of accidentally starts the first real World War (The Seven Years War which spanned five continents to greater and lesser degrees and was called The French and Indian War in the North American theater), we have this incident which serves as the comparable Archduke Ferdinand moment. Washington has captured some French soldiers who had surrendered (insert the obligatory joke here) after a brief skirmish. Their leader is one Joseph Coulon de Villiers de Jumonville who was from a family of some importance across the foam. Suddenly one of Washington's Indian allies, Tanaghrisson (the Half King)
...gripping his hatchet, stepped over to Jumonville and said something. Then he sank his weapon into the Frenchman's skull.This account is disputed, and we will likely never know if it or one of the other versions of the story is true, but murdering an adversary and washing one's hands in his brains was a common Indian practice. So was slowly torturing a captive over the course of several days until he died, then wearing the fingers and toes of the victim in one's hatband. Scalping was also par for the course, and the Europeans even got in on the action when they offered bounties for Indian scalps which became a lucrative business for some. The Europeans and colonists were just as horrible, but in a different way: "For Amerindians and English alike, warfare in seventeenth-century North America was characterized by shocking excess. If the Puritans were horrified by the native penchant for mutilation and scalping, the Indians found the European willingness to wage total war with enormous casualties almost insane."
The tense quiet of the glen suddenly vanished with the noise of slaughter. As his warriors set upon the wounded French and began scalping them, the Iroquios Half-King reached into Jumonville's yawning cranium and ritually washed his hands in the gray matter. With awesome quickness, as the English stood frozen and agape, all but one of the wounded French were murdered.
In 1637 Massachusetts, various Indian tribes had alliances with various colonial villages from various European nationalities, but not all of them got along, and some retaliatory killings were taking place between the Dutch and the Pequots. Since one European looked just like another to an Indian and vice versa, the Pequots killed a random trader named John Stone. However, John wasn't Dutch, he was English. This would be a costly oops. "Though widely considered a cad and a scoundrel throughout New England, Stone became a rallying cry - evidence of how unscrupulous the English could be when searching for a convenient cause celebre." Negotiations immediately went nowhere, and the Puritans figured it was time to bring the reckoning to these godless, demon worshipers, and it was on.
The Pequots, nonplussed by the issue over Stone's nationality, were further hampered by an inability to comprehend why a whole people would push the death of an unpopular sea captain to the point of war. Stone's murder, after all, was merely the final in a series of retaliatory slayings - personal vendettas that were ubiquitous in Algonquin culture. What did this have to do with war?We don't seem to have evolved very much in the past 400 years, and there is nothing new under the sun. In 2020 George Floyd, hardly an upstanding citizen, was needlessly murdered and the US tore itself apart. (I'm sorry if such a comparison is too soon for some of you, but it crossed my mind, and I call it like I see it.)
Given the Indians' barbarity, one wonders how Europeans ever had a chance of gaining a foothold on the continent, but conditions had been inadvertently primed for them by Columbus and friends when they brought with them a host of diseases against which the Indians had no immunity.
Smallpox, influenza, measles, typhus, malaria, bubonic and pneumonic plague, and yellow fever - this was the rogue's gallery that fell so hard upon the Amerindians, brought unwittingly from Eurasia by Christian adventurers who had no reason to suspect that their own germs could wreak such havoc...Population loss estimates actually range between 50-90%, but that was certainly enough. There simply weren't enough people to fight back effectively should they have chosen to fight, but this book makes quite clear that yes, indeed, the Indians were willing to fight. The Indians got us back, though, when they introduced syphilis to the Europeans which started wreaking havoc in the old world a mere three years after Columbus' first journey. This hardly seems like an even trade, but whatcha gonna do?
Up to 90 percent of the population of the Americas died within two generations of 1492, the diseases racing from one village to the next, running wild among populations with no defense whatsoever against them. In much of North America, this fate befell peoples for whom white-skinned travelers from afar were still the stuff of rumors.
Slavery was also discussed in this, but it took a backseat to the wars and other conflicts. There was one line in here about it that amused me, though. George Chicken, a commander during the Yemassee War in South Carolina, had a mixed crew of white militia and black slaves who were waiting to ambush some approaching Indians. "We may never know whether they understood the greater absurdity of this moment: that Englishmen, thousands of miles from their homeland, found themselves defending a hostile wilderness they had taken from somebody else with soldiers they'd stolen from another continent - and led by a man named 'Chicken.'"
This is just a sample of the fun facts you can find in this book, and I don't want to give everything away, so check it out if you like what you've seen so far.
June 30, 2023
Basically, everyone is awful in this book. Full of bits of history that usually don't make it into a standard curriculum.
May 18, 2022
The Aurthor throws in subtle hints of opinions that ruin the book. If you are looking for a book with the pure intention to teach history look somewhere else. This book is not the one.
February 1, 2023
Two centuries of historical vignettes about the earliest history of the European occupation of what is now the United States. This book was pretty good. Every chapter starts with the main historical figure standing in the morning cold and looking out over the horizon, or standing in the afternoon heat and looking out past the earthen ramparts or something similar, but the historiography is good and I learned things. This book doesn't piece together a full narrative of the time between the conquest of Spanish Florida and George Washington's early whoopsie-doodle, but it selects some major events and tells them well and in a generally non-biased way, with plenty of drama. There are also great reproductions of historic depictions of events here; some are contemporary, some are patriotic guesses from the 19th and 20th centuries. This book also has information boxes that are barely delineated from the actual text, which can be slightly confusing sometimes. The dramatic narration, the art, the three quarters format, the side-bars: Cormac O'Brien is a good writer and historian, but this book is not history to be read, this book is intended as a birthday gift for your grandpa. Your grandpa will be impressed by the color pictures, and he'll like the overly descriptive narratives because they're like a mid-century school book. The font is not for your grandpa, but he has cheaters.
December 24, 2013
Cormac O'Brien's "The Forgotten History of America: Little Known Conflicts of Lasting Importance from the Earliest Colonists to the Eve of the Revolution" takes us on a 200 year trek across the founding of the colonies in the New World en route to the Revolutionary War. Across not quite 300 pages O'Brien examines 18 different events (some known & some unknown) that changed the course of North American history forever. Each chapter is well done & contains enough information for we the reader to understand just why these events are as important as they are. A very interesting read for anyone interesting in Colonial American history & a bargain at any price.
January 5, 2021
A surprisingly illuminating and very readable survey of pre-Revolutionary "American" history (it focuses almost entirely on the eastern half of North America after a brief bit about the Spanish colonial enterprise).
I think if the goal is to get beyond the usual enthusiast spheres, this book is successful. I could imagine a class discussing a chapter and having a lot to talk about. O'Brien fleshes out the world of pre-revolutionary America, reminding readers that history is not neatly divided in the before and after of Yorktown.
Thinking critically, I'd like to have seen some sourcing or even a further reading section. The author undoubtedly drew upon a healthy list of drier manuscripts, research, and primary sources and those should have been credited. A few of the illustrations might have been sacrificed in favor of maps, especially when conflicts involving Indian tribes were discussed.
Overall though, very good. Something I'll be keeping in my library.
I think if the goal is to get beyond the usual enthusiast spheres, this book is successful. I could imagine a class discussing a chapter and having a lot to talk about. O'Brien fleshes out the world of pre-revolutionary America, reminding readers that history is not neatly divided in the before and after of Yorktown.
Thinking critically, I'd like to have seen some sourcing or even a further reading section. The author undoubtedly drew upon a healthy list of drier manuscripts, research, and primary sources and those should have been credited. A few of the illustrations might have been sacrificed in favor of maps, especially when conflicts involving Indian tribes were discussed.
Overall though, very good. Something I'll be keeping in my library.
March 13, 2022
Really well written and fun to read about the lesser known figures of the colonization of the Americas.
April 4, 2015
This was a pretty good book. Its font was really small and I thought it was going to be difficult due to that, but it was actually a very quick read.
"The forgotten history" isn't quite accurate. I knew most of the incidents that were covered, although it's been many years since I first read about them. I certainly don't know this period of US history as well as I know the 19th and 20th centuries.
It was mostly the appalling story of the Europeans' racism and mistreatment of Native Americans, with a bit about Africans as well. Interesting to read about the Native Americans' inability to get along among themselves as well. And of course there stories of religious prejudice as well. Not exactly an uplifting tale of human kindness and enlightenment!
"The forgotten history" isn't quite accurate. I knew most of the incidents that were covered, although it's been many years since I first read about them. I certainly don't know this period of US history as well as I know the 19th and 20th centuries.
It was mostly the appalling story of the Europeans' racism and mistreatment of Native Americans, with a bit about Africans as well. Interesting to read about the Native Americans' inability to get along among themselves as well. And of course there stories of religious prejudice as well. Not exactly an uplifting tale of human kindness and enlightenment!
December 8, 2015
Good collection of lesser-know early North American history. Each chapter is a self-contained episode of history so the book is only unified by the fact that these events took place in NA before the revolution. So if you're looking for a systematic historical treatment of these events this isn't the book for you, and why I couldn't give it five stars.
But the chapters are well written and insightful into not only the events they cover but also the greater context and significance of those events. And the narratives are all lesser known stories than most books of this type so I really enjoyed it.
But the chapters are well written and insightful into not only the events they cover but also the greater context and significance of those events. And the narratives are all lesser known stories than most books of this type so I really enjoyed it.
September 6, 2019
Not really straight history, but rather novelized history. It describes the thoughts, aims, and fears of the characters. Makes it more entertaining, perhaps, but the author had to guess. Heavily illustrated with paintings and drawings made before modern times but after the fact. Nonetheless not a bad read.
Thus us a beautifully produced book, especially for a paperback. Heavt paper, profuse illustrations, lots of white space. I wonder how it came to be.
Thus us a beautifully produced book, especially for a paperback. Heavt paper, profuse illustrations, lots of white space. I wonder how it came to be.
July 26, 2015
I found the stories about the French and Indian War to be especially interesting. The history classes I took in high school and college didn't really cover this period of time in-depth. There's a lot that happened between the age of discovery and the revolutionary war, and understanding it gives a better insight into the origins of the American ethos.
July 19, 2019
It is easy to forget just big America is with our modern means of communications. The events told here give an insight in to the way people viewed their rights and their attitudes towards the indigenous populations. It also showed how the rivalries between the European countries spilled over to the conquest and exploitation of the new continent. When you can see houses in the UK which were built in the time when the events described in the book were taking place it makes you realise just how recently it all took place.
December 27, 2023
Forgotten History: Racist French and English in early America.
This History of Early America is like other books I have read. European white people reducing the life of Early societies. The French and English destruction of those we misunderstood.
This History of Early America is like other books I have read. European white people reducing the life of Early societies. The French and English destruction of those we misunderstood.
March 3, 2019
Found the book a little to dry to enjoy reading. Topics covered were interesting.
August 7, 2025
Interesting, but I could not stay with it until the end...read about 3/4 of the book and moved on.
June 8, 2015
Not as good as I'd hoped, O'Brien's history tells the tales of battles on American soil from 1528, as the Spanish conquerors of Mexico first ventured northward into Florida and across the Southwest, through 1763, after the French and Indian war on the doorstep of revolution.
The story of each battle is told in a separate chapter, and O'Brien never weaves together a consistent thread to connect the events. In some of the accounts of events in the New England region, he does suggest that the events were a possibly inevitable result of cultural conflict as French, English, native American, and the emerging colonial American cultures clashed over land ownership, land use, religion, and political borders. More often his stories are just episodic and narrative. The problem is that the chapters, each 15 to 20 pages in length with numerous illustrations, are too short to develop the narrative enough to understand the people, places, and forces in play.
In some ways, this reads like an upper-level high school or lower-level college textbook for a survey course of American pre-colonial history--for which it might be useful, but the bibliography is probably too sparse to merit academic value. For example, in telling the story of lost Spanish conquistador De Vaca's incredible journey across the Southwestern United States in the 1500s, O'Brien does not reference Brutal Journey: The Epic Story of the First Crossing of North America, a 2006 book-length account of the event.
I'll give credit for three stars here for the focus on some important events nearly lost to history. O'Brien's stories prove that during the 250 years they cover America was not a trackless wilderness waiting for discovery or revolution. But the book would have been better with fewer illustrations to allow more development of the narratives, and with the addition of an epilogue to bring together the threads into a common set of themes and show how those themes led to the Revolution soon to come.
The story of each battle is told in a separate chapter, and O'Brien never weaves together a consistent thread to connect the events. In some of the accounts of events in the New England region, he does suggest that the events were a possibly inevitable result of cultural conflict as French, English, native American, and the emerging colonial American cultures clashed over land ownership, land use, religion, and political borders. More often his stories are just episodic and narrative. The problem is that the chapters, each 15 to 20 pages in length with numerous illustrations, are too short to develop the narrative enough to understand the people, places, and forces in play.
In some ways, this reads like an upper-level high school or lower-level college textbook for a survey course of American pre-colonial history--for which it might be useful, but the bibliography is probably too sparse to merit academic value. For example, in telling the story of lost Spanish conquistador De Vaca's incredible journey across the Southwestern United States in the 1500s, O'Brien does not reference Brutal Journey: The Epic Story of the First Crossing of North America, a 2006 book-length account of the event.
I'll give credit for three stars here for the focus on some important events nearly lost to history. O'Brien's stories prove that during the 250 years they cover America was not a trackless wilderness waiting for discovery or revolution. But the book would have been better with fewer illustrations to allow more development of the narratives, and with the addition of an epilogue to bring together the threads into a common set of themes and show how those themes led to the Revolution soon to come.
August 24, 2015
This is absolutely one of the best history books I've ever read, bar none. It's like reading the DNA combinations of our ancestors' conflicts that determined how this country of ours turned out to be the way it is. Find out why we don't speak French, and why we're not all Puritans. The pre-Revolution years were much more violent and contentious than I ever imagined. I have two knocks against the author. He overuses the word "slaughtered." One side is always "slaughtering" the other side. There are many other ways to convey the same message without using the same word over and over. By the end of the book, it becomes a distraction that should have been caught by the editor. The other glitch is the use of a term that didn't come into existence for almost two hundred years after the time period in which the author uses it. He purports that Robert Rogers is thinking that his future story about walking into an enemy city to reconnoiter will be a real "duzy." It had to be an unconscious use of a familiar term without thinking of its origin. The word "duzy" was a slang superlative that was derived from the Duesenburg automobile that became very popular with the rich and famous in the 1920s and 30s. Robert Rogers would never have heard of the term. Other than those two things, this is a very entertaining and educational book.
May 16, 2013
A lot of times, studies of American history skips or completely ignores the colonial period with the exception of Plymouth Rock and Jamestown. This is where this book is a great read in that you get a better picture of what America was really like up to the point of the American Revolution.
Many of the histories within this book I was somewhat familiar with but did not have the full understanding on how many of the conflicts depicted came into being and what impact it had on shaping American history.
As the title states, it really is a Forgotten History of America
Many of the histories within this book I was somewhat familiar with but did not have the full understanding on how many of the conflicts depicted came into being and what impact it had on shaping American history.
As the title states, it really is a Forgotten History of America
December 29, 2014
A tough read but a good insight to a period of American colonial history generally overlooked. Worth wading through the details to better understand to evolution of the mistrust and double dealing among the European and Native cultures of the new world. Graphic historical violence at places not dissimilar to what is in current Middle-eastern news. A bit more disconcerting, though, when perpetuated by our Puritan forebears or a colonial Governor Penn.
August 23, 2010
While many of the tales within were well known to me, there were several less familiar stories that I enjoyed the author's deftly written descriptions of. A solid overview and introduction to a period of "American history".
Want to read
September 27, 2009$11.99
December 31, 2011
Pretty good. Descriptions were shorter than I would have liked and had less continuity, but a good primer on early American conflicts and colonization.
December 8, 2020
Great little stories of colonial America, although I wouldn't call the majority of them "forgotten." This was not heavy on citations or nuance.
August 12, 2017
I really wanted to like this book. I did. But I got annoyed with the style, then I couldn't un-annoy myself.
Displaying 1 - 24 of 24 reviews