this was a big difference from the first book. the first book was erotic horror, not a romance. it was twisted and yk erotically horrifying. so personally, i don’t like that book one, an erotic horror, is followed by this book, which is a romance with a HEA. it doesn’t make sense. the only HEA that should’ve been written is the fmc getting everything she deserves and living her life, not an ending where she ends up with the man that drugged her and allowed 40 men to SA her.
if the first book was written as a dark romance, with dark romance aspects instead of erotic horror, or even as erotic romance, then sure this duet would’ve been great. it would’ve been twisted and dark but would have made sense to have a HEA. but the first book was strictly erotic horror, nothing about it gave dark romance or any type of romance at all. so idk where this book came from and how this ending fits bc it tries to make the first book look romantic when it’s not.
separately the books could’ve been great, one is erotic horror, and one is a dark romance mmc redeeming himself (barely too bc he didn’t do much) together tho? yeah no. it doesn’t work.
aside from them being a duet and my issues with that. the timeline doesn’t follow, the mmc says they only spent one night together, when it seemed like more than one night in the first book. he also mentions how they spent such good time, laughing, at ease, but book one strictly shows him using her body. only looking at her as a body. so when did that happen?