What an incredible text. I say text and not book to somehow emphasize that this is a seminal contribution to the literature on caste in India and should be read widely and seriously.
For books I really really like, I usually summarize what the book covers, but given the excellent introduction to the book by the author which does this better than anyone can possibly, I restrict my review to major learnings.
I have been curious about the class vs caste questions. Through my readings of anti-racism movements in the US and anti-caste movements in India, I’ve tried to determine where the overlap lies. On this, the author’s analysis is superb– primarily because he’s fed up with technical and ‘doctrinal’ approaches to the differences. For all practical purposes, the author believes, building on what Ambedkar believed, that the class and caste movements are aligned and not at odds, despite what the communists believed. The author traces Ambedkar’s dislike of the communists for creating a split in caste-class solidarity: mostly that upper caste men, heading the communist movements in India, believed that castes as sub-divisions within classes prevent class solidarity and the consequential proletariat movement.
The author further laments how grassroot anti-caste movements have dissipated, have no coherent ideology, ail from internal contradictions and how mainstream caste leaders have failed the people. The author’s analysis is never in the air, it’s deeply rooted in extremely detailed analysis.
The author boldly questions some very basic approaches in the movement against caste discrimination, bringing out inherent contradictions within the movement and with those trying to co-opt the movement. Through the many contradictions that come out of plain reading of the history of Ambedkar, duly appropriated by whichever side wishes to co-opt him within their ideology, the author guides the reader through the common denominator that underlined Ambedkar’s ideology. In my view, he attempts to portray/reconstruct what ‘Ambedkarism’ would really mean. He then brings out how Ambedkarites themselves are at odds with Ambedkar’s ideology at times, and how other ‘nationalist’ groups co-opting Ambedkar have no conceivable ground to. It’s fascinating to see the author boldly navigate through the ideas of Ambedkarism. His main argument is that Ambedkarism isn’t a school of thought, since Ambedkar’s ideas were pragmatic solutions to existing issues rather than a complete ideology. ‘Liberal’ is the closest ‘tag’ that you can put to it. Beyond this, the author brings out how present followers practice quite the opposite of what he professed.
The author doesn’t assume that reservations are a panacea for all ills. Interestingly, he criticizes reservations for creating resentment that spirals into violence, especially in villages. He also criticizes how the approach of educating and empowering a certain proportion of the SC/ST population hasn’t reaped dividends. He also offers a tangible solution: a non-caste one. Take the nuclear family as the basic unit for reservations and prioritize families that have not yet availed the benefit of reservations. These are interesting solutions that should be considered.
The author addresses caste violence and reservations in detail at the beginning of the book. The instances he narrates are chilling, the upper caste impunities they bring out are stark. He carries out a searing indictment of abuses by the State apparatus when it comes to Dalits in ‘Manufacturing Maoists’. The author brings out how the State machinery creates false cases against Dalits, tribals and dissenters, keeping them in jail for years without bail while freely allowing perpetrators of atrocities to loom large. The author, himself a prisoner today, predicts how the State handles political dissenters.
The book has so much more to offer. There are chapters on how the BSP has fared, what the AAP is offering, what the Congress did and what the BJP tries to do. Education, manual scavenging, Dalit protests and many other themes have been covered. But most importantly, it’s the detailed scrutiny of certain concepts that we take for granted that’s important. There is much to consider. The author’s job is done, it’s for us to take these ideas forward.