It might have been more honest for me to give this book three stars. After all, I was relieved to see that most of the other reviewers here didn't enjoy Whiteout as much as Ted's other books either. It took me days to get through some of the chapters-- not because of their legnth, but because I could barely find an F to give about some of the subject matter (for example, who the hell cares about how long [literally like 1/3 of a friggin chapter] it took you to figure out the confusing layout of your new office at the Aspen Times, Ted? 😂).
But what the hell, I'm still gonna bump it up because 1.) Ted's an O.G., 2.) this is *good writing* occasionally overshadowed by subject matter that will bore you half to death if you aren't personally that interested in it and 3.) what I appreciate most about Ted's books, as I have said in other reviews, are his observations about people and human nature.
In other words, I didn't mind putting up with the more boring parts. I have this personal theory (well, this is probably a lot of other people's theory too, especially given the number of sitcoms and movies that feature a scene with a good angel on one shoulder and bad angel on the other) that human beings potentially all have a darker side to our nature, one that might be mostly latent or undeveloped in the majority of us. So what might it take to lead any single one of us down the same road that the most depraved people society produces take? I'm personally guessing some unique combination of nature and nurture.
By exploring the lives of Aspen's uppercrust, particularly the celebrities who flocked there (at least at the time the book was written --late 80s/early 90s), Ted highlights one way nurture can contribute, how human beings can be incentivized towards narcissism. I'll admit, I was most interested in the chapters about his experiences with celebrities-- even celebrities I have never heard of (they don't tend to have a long shelf life, and this book was published two years before I was born). The fact that they still seemed so important to me even if I had never heard of them probably hints at some superficial traits within myself that causes me to unconsciously value them based on their status.
Whatever the case, I was shocked at a passage about how rudely Barbara Walters (who I always thought seemed like such a level headed person) had apparently treated a restaurant wait staff, how entitled her behavior was. Another passage really struck me: Ted walks into a restaurant and spots the actor George Hamilton (I'd never heard of him either. But apparently he was well-known back in the day, handsome and extremely, EXTREMELY tanned.) Ted noticed that George seemed to be too distracted to pay attention to his date, and he kept looking off to a spot in the distance. Later Ted realized that, in the exact spot George had kept staring, was a mirror... He noticed a lot of similar behaviors in other celebrities.
At some point I wondered: if you have everything you could ever want (money, fame, people fawning over you and constantly telling you how great you are) is it basically just inevitable to become your most egotistical self, to the point you see other people as mere nuisances if they don't serve your ego?
Here's something else I found interesting: at the time Ted wrote this book, Jesse Jackson was running for president. The stridently liberal, wealthy Aspenites flocked to his rally in their expensive, brightly colored ski gear. Some of them were even moved to tears by Jackson's hard-knock life speech. I wondered why such wealthy people, especially celebrities, who are so disconnected from the problems of the real world, tend to be so liberal-minded. Are they just virtue signalling, or do they genuinely care? Ted even mentions that the mayor of Aspen at the time was a staunch vegetarian, animal rights activist (or something or another) who posed naked for a calendar and etc
"That seems well-meaning enough," I thought. It's nice to want to think about your effect on the world around you, and what's wrong with being open-minded? But I think what I realized is that-- although it is well-meaning to want to care about others, and to want to speak up for people who are treated unfairly in the world, to want to challenge conventions-- like most people in life, the celebrities are also searching for deeper meaning... It's just that, when you live in a world surrounded by yes-men and where your basic needs are met so many times over, where your ego is pumped up more than you even realize, your desire for meaning, your ability to connect with people outside your world, easily gets tangled up with your ego, your need to feel virtuous... moral... special... *superior.*
As Ted points out, people in Aspen aren't interacting with society's poor or marginalized. There aren't any homeless or downtrodden people in Aspen (even the regular gray and white collar nurses, police officers and teachers can't afford to live in the city limits unless they purchase a $100,000 mobile home. At Christmastime, the local Santa was a trim, fit ski instructor. Everyone is skinny, tan and rich in Aspen.) In other words, for example it's pretty easy to look down on meat-eaters if you don't have any real clue how much fresh produce costs the average person. It's easy to pride yourself on supporting the downtrodden if "supporting the poor" means donating to a charity from a distance rather than getting to know any of them and experiencing the full range of the good, the bad and the ugly.
It's no wonder, then, that this sort of naive thinking could lead to the conference Ted observed in the book, where wealthy Aspenites showed a VHS tape depicting starving, crying people in third world countries suddenly smiling in joy at the sight of wealthy Americans leading a run through their village with a "we are the world" type of song in the background. Apparently the Aspenites, caught up in 90s New Age spirituality, earnestly believed they could solve the problems of the third world (something they seemed to genuinely care about) by introducing them to their recreational hobbies.
Ya gotta read this shit to believe it, so here is the exact passage from the book: "... most of the two-hour session was concerned not with empowerment or leadership training but with letting the audience know about the First Earth Run, which the couple had organized, and seeing how people responded to it. The First Earth Run, designed 'to celebrate our possibility to live in harmony with each other and with the planet,' involved mainly, as far as I could tell, the export of jogging from from California to countries of the third world. A videotape was shown, opening with shots of a crying black mother and her starving child, of maimed kids suffering, of third world misery. Then torch-bearing joggers appeared, resulting in scenes of people cheering and smiling ('The Masai had a total knowing of the power of the flame,' intoned Gershon.)... the lesson of the film, according to Gershon, was that 'we can create the world we want..."
I... I just don't even know how you come up with something like that.
And yet, as the book went on, Ted also found himself slowly seduced by this superficial culture, to the point that he slowly found himself looking down on his hometown, dressing like the Aspenites, contemplating buying an expensive car and property, unable to enjoy restaurants that weren't "high brow" enough. His friends kept noticing, sadly, that he had changed. I guess this book, however boring, is a reminder of how easily we can all fall, how important it is to stay grounded. So that's why I don't mind giving this book an extra star I guess. :)