Traitor's Blood sets the Civil War Chronicals up to be a monster of a series. Some works of historical fiction lean heavily enough to the historical feel and detail that it actually detracts from the flow of the tale, while others can fly so free with the accuracy that it's little more than fantasy. Michael Arnold has hit, with his first novel, that coveted spot where the history is well presented and feels solid and detailed, and yet never gets in the way of a speedy and exciting plot.
Another way to put it is that some works of historical fiction are pure literature and will always be, and while that is laudable, it doesn't necessarily make them interesting. Arnold's work reads like a high-budget, well-scripted movie. It is almost visual in its style and you can easily imagine it on the big screen. Someone who reviewed my own work said that they rated a book on its readability (based on how long it took them to get through it.) The first time I read Traitor's Blood it took me a week (which was fast for me at the time due to work). I just re-read it in three sessions.
The characters are excellent. Nothing surprising, I'd say, but in a fast-paced action/war/adventure there's less need to delve too deep into character construction and some writers of such work run with a very standard character relying on the pace and excitement to keep the reader hooked. In such work, it is far better to have really knave-ish villains, dextrous thieves, hearty, noble officers and bloodthirsty soldiers. Arnold has, however, put genuine depth into all his characters which adds a dimension to the read.
The main character, Captain Styker, who is the focus of the series beyond, is a hero with dark facets: almost - but not quite - an antihero. He is feared and vicious, loyal and true. He's the sort of man you can imagine serving on the Royalist staff. For those who have ever seen the fabulous costume drama 'The Devil's Whore', Edward Sexby in that 4-parter might well have been a fore-runner of Stryker. Good for me, since I loved Sexby and this means I get more of the same vein. The character stands out in the field of such stories and is instantly likeable and memorable.
Oh and for the record: I love Forry too!
I will briefly delve into plot but, as always, will give away no spoilers. This story is set in the opening salvos of the war, beginning with Kineton. The story follows the first season of the war, from minor skirmish to major engagement in all the technocolour and blood and guts one might hope for. But the plot is more than this. It is a tale of revenge against an old adversary, a story of turncoats and spies, of Royalist agents and the one tiny item that could bring down the whole nation.
My last comment will be this: There is a great tendency these days to portray the Parliamentarians of the civil war as God-fearing righteous men, and the Royalists as foppish, papist imbeciles with more fingers than brain cells. As a staunch Royalist myself, it has grated on me. I recently read Giles Kristian's Bleeding Land, and that book approaches both sides well. Traitor's Blood takes the bold leap to following the Royalist cause that we all know is eventually doomed. And it's bloody marvellous to read.
Bravo, sir.