It took me over a month to get through this book. Why? Because it's boring, boring, boring, boring. Not that the previous book, Captive of Gor, was all that great because Norman tried going outside the box by writing from a female perspective, and utterly failed, but there is absolutely nothing new in Hunters.
The Goodreads description of the book does not do it justice at all, but I don't think I'm going to spoil anything by saying that our "darling hero," Tarl Cabot, now going by "Bosk of Port Kar," hears that his beloved Talena ('Memba her?) has been captured, so he goes on a mission to rescue her. Simple, right? Insert groan here.
What should have been an interesting struggle to rescue Talena from those who held her turns out to be a major disappointment. I'm not going to say why because I hate spoilers (though it's tempting in this case), but our protagonist ends up not going through with his plans about halfway through the book. I personally think the reason is stupid, but you can make up your own mind.
The biggest problem I have is that the majority of the book is taken up with repetitious descriptions of things, especially how Tarl/Bosk binds his female slaves when he captures them. Once, I can understand, but he continues the same long, windy explanations every single time. They get old. Fast. As does the "A woman's natural place is to do whatever a man says," mentality. I let it slide in the first six books, but in this one, he beats you over the head with it. Not cool, Norman.
It's possible Tarl/Bosk actually takes a step back in his character growth. While I think Norman intended him to become more Gorean, he comes across in this particular book as a complete prick. So maybe Norman accomplished his goal. The problem is that, in that case, he didn't take it far enough. Throughout the book, Tarl/Bosk is constantly treating the women he captures like garbage. He threatens to sell them and treat them badly. (They are, after all, just animals. *eyeroll*) But then, in the end, he frees most of the ones he verbally abuses. I, personally, don't see the logic in it.
I'm not against a little bondage fantasy. When done right, it can have the effect it intends. I don't think this was done right, at all. It's methodical, not inventive. It's passe, not active. It's like Norman got in a rut and kept repeating the same things over and over again, hoping that in doing so, it would titillate his readers. I've seen some reviews where it had just that effect. Can't say I was a fan.
Don't let the description of this book fool you. Read the first paragraph and stop because you'll be disappointed that the rest doesn't accurately reflect this book. In fact, I was so put off by what actually happened that I'm not sure I want to read Marauders. Well, if nothing else, I'll take a break, read something else, and maybe come back to it later.