A groundbreaking look at how the interrogation rooms of the Korean War set the stage for a new kind of battle—not over land but over human subjects
Traditional histories of the Korean War have long focused on violations of the thirty-eighth parallel, the line drawn by American and Soviet officials in 1945 dividing the Korean peninsula. But The Interrogation Rooms of the Korean War presents an entirely new narrative, shifting the perspective from the boundaries of the battlefield to inside the interrogation room. Upending conventional notions of what we think of as geographies of military conflict, Monica Kim demonstrates how the Korean War evolved from a fight over territory to one over human interiority and the individual human subject, forging the template for the US wars of intervention that would predominate during the latter half of the twentieth century and beyond.
Kim looks at how, during the armistice negotiations, the United States and their allies proposed a new kind of interrogation room: one in which POWs could exercise their “free will” and choose which country they would go to after the ceasefire. The global controversy that erupted exposed how interrogation rooms had become a flashpoint for the struggles between the ambitions of empire and the demands for decolonization, as the aim of interrogation was to produce subjects who attested to a nation’s right to govern. The complex web of interrogators and prisoners—Japanese-American interrogators, Indian military personnel, Korean POWs and interrogators, and American POWs—that Kim uncovers contradicts the simple story in US popular memory of “brainwashing” during the Korean War.
Bringing together a vast range of sources that track two generations of people moving between three continents, The Interrogation Rooms of the Korean War delves into an essential yet overlooked aspect of modern warfare in the twentieth century.
An interesting look into the intimacies of war, and a cool argument about how war is defined by the individual experience, not the other way around. Talks about how the Korean war moved a lot of political and colonial fears from the theoretical into the realm of actuality. Kim frames it around how interrogation was about the power to redefine the nature of the relationship between the colonizer and the colonized: it gave narrative, it was about political recognition, and it was about American selfhood and citizenry. Doesn't fully get into the specifics or follow all the way through with the argument that would have made this 4 or 5 stars for me. This would be a good companion piece to a lot of things: Winter in Sokcho, Cat's Cradle, Pachinko, A Gesture Life.
“War, we assume, is a part of the universal human condition. And when war converges with another age-old human impulse—storytelling—war emerges from the story more akin to a force of nature than a mere man-made event. The horror, the violence, and the rapture of war distill into allegories and meditations on the nature of humankind. To tell a story about war is to tell a story about humanity.”
“It was no longer sufficient to declare war in the patent interests of the state. Now, war would have to be conducted in the name of “humanity,” framed in the terms of a universal conflict rather than a state-specific necessity. War could now only be conducted as a disavowal of war itself.”
Disclaimer: large part of this book is not 4/5, many pages are 1/5 with constant repeats, thesaurus vocabulary, and batshit insane opinions... but the rest is perhaps the only place in widely accessible literature where you can get such historical details.
Really interesting history that maps the intimacies of how American interventionism shaped the violence and psychological outcomes of the Korean War and Korean POWs. But the argument was less clear at times.