My son (an engineering major brave enough to pick a book for his English-teacher father) gave me this book for Christmas, and I was pleasantly surprised.
I didn't expect to dislike it, since the title promised an intriguing mystery, but I figured it would deal with obscure writers/texts and might end up being an interesting detective story with not much more to offer. What surprised me was the caliber of writers who have lost books--Hemingway, Plath, Gogol, Byron--and the weight that this search takes on.
The book is interesting because van Straten takes a storytelling approach to each mystery. He puts us in a context with deftly chosen details of time and place. His quest fills in background about the lives of the authors, but also about the historical and social circumstances that led to the disappearance of books: war, homophobia, perfectionism, jealousy, fire (common, it seems, to all places and times, and functioning almost as a symbol in this book). I learned things about writers I care about (for instance, the insights into the marriage between Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes are enlightening), and discovered a book I want to read (Under the Volcano, by Malcolm Lowry).
The book has weight because of those historical and social circumstances, and also because it highlights the fragility of literature. Books, when we read them, may seem inevitable, but in truth we are fortunate to have them. As van Straten points out, books may have been more vulnerable in the days when they only existed on paper (and, at some point, in only one copy), but cyberspace carries its own forms of vulnerability. A variety of accidents (or hostilities) may keep even great books from ever reaching us. So my takeaway from this book is that we should treasure our reading even more than we already do, feeling appropriately grateful for each literary gem that finds its way to us. And, if we ever find ourselves in the position of deciding the fate of a book, we should decide in favor of its would-be readers.
On the disappointing side, the book is so short. That worked out well for me because I had a goal to read 20 books in 2019. I started In Search of Lost Books on Dec. 28, and its brevity enabled me to make my goal. Still, at 123 pages of generously spaced text, it's barely long enough to count as a book. It left me wanting more stories. Maybe that's a good thing (better than boring), but still... Also, the book seemed to be heavy on speculation. Often, when van Straten made a claim about one of the authors or about the content of the missing text, I found myself asking, "But how do you know?" Sometimes the book answers that question, but too often it doesn't, and that makes me skeptical.
Nevertheless, because he is clearly intelligent and passionate about books, I'm inclined to trust van Straten. I'm grateful for the stories he shares, and they make me grateful for the myriad books that have not been lost, and for which I have renewed appreciation of the privilege it is to read them.