Galloping past the asylum itself and long-jumping finally into it’s pantathaletic partition, antelopes themselves would be mesmerized by the dexterity of Lapham’s mind: too bad it never goes anywhere however. Departing further from the established orbit of the established Noir system, a purer approach to crime becomes merely encrusted and draped over with the ephemera and tints and tones and expressions of film-noir with style trumping all else. An artistic vision run amok – or a Jason Pollakesque expression of art? We’ll have to discuss before we decide.
Like a million bizarre fantasies of yours truly, I wish I could get into the head of a (most-likely) upper-middle class kid in the mid-late 90’s, especially a dude/tte that had not only finished this spate of comics (collected and reviewed here: for your pleasure) but enjoyed them as well. What propelled their interest? What was their cultural climate like?
Contemporaneously, Pulp Fiction had been established and mined beyond belief here and yet Stray Bullets kept on chuggin’. With a degree of violence matching and then exceeding to match that of another contemporaneous peer (The Matrix) enough bullets are rained and enough pints of blood are spilled to match the soon to be war fueled (Post-9/11) era. But the question remains, no matter how much it did, or was going to match the premonitions of the future (whilst excavating the very past that informed it) what granted this (ostensibly) pimple-faced teenager fueled comic the capacity for cult favorite?
Why? Because even retroactively, Stray Bullets glints with the shine of just enough of its gems to cover its innumerably hideous flaws. A healthily applied sheen of nostalgia, will penetrate the heart of nigh almost the most bitter of curmudgeon/cynic/nihilist. With these facts in mind, the stylistic make-up of Stray Bullets well overshadows the flaws and mistakes of the series overall. Favoring energy over something more pre-planned – the meanings and motives and decisions made within become more pleasing to the eye in their own way. With each touch of the page, both are sated but, which more (so)?
Does it matter? Yes, it does actually. Without any hope of departing past the 3 star mark, another edition of the Stray Bullets series lies swaddled in its crib. The cries of a dinky child might equalize the blinking and nagging lights of the latest dooty-doo-doo* but, once the initial provocation has died down the nagging irritations are still there. This leaves Lapham’s late 90’s fictional-faux-80’s-noirish crime/noir hybrid, ossified unto its own vision (for better and for worse).
*Ultimately giving up attention to the stories themselves and their paper-thin degrees of cohesion, paying far more attention to the action and flow will result in a far more enjoyable reading experience (author’s intention?). In either case, with an expanded field of vision that has, finally exceeded the unitary creative stream of Pulp Fiction, Lapham has incorporated semi-substantial references from previous cultural well-known-known-known’s including: Sin City, Twilight Zone, and even The Big Lebowski just to name a few. Through a stylistic process that can be described as emergently multivariate, the story itself - while remaining idiosyncratically static, has freshened its veneer with some much needed instruction(s) from the past.