Q: The Bearable Lightness of Well-Doing ....
Embrace the unexpected. (c)
An extra short read with some precious implications.
Q:
I strongly suspect that extraverted readers will have attempted to lick their own elbows. They may have also successfully licked the elbow of the person sitting next to them. (c)
Q:
Is there anything positive about neuroticism? In some respects, neurotic individuals are highly sensitive people who, like the canaries in the mine, can detect things that less sensitive people simply don’t register—changes in the environment, disturbances in routines, and whiffs of danger from unexpected sources. This is not conducive to relaxed and easy living. But writers and artists and others who are astute observers of life are often found to have a neurotic disposition. In the evolutionary provenance of human personality, I suspect that stable extraverts were the first to discover prey, and we all benefited from eating what they caught. To survive, however, we also needed the neurotic introverts who were especially likely to discover predators. We should be equally grateful to them for decreasing our chances of being sniffed out, hunted down, and eaten. (c)
Q:
it occurred to me that the drive itself, the journey I was on, was more than just the elaboration of my personal constructs. Something was missing. I pulled off the highway, too distracted by the idea taking form to keep driving. What I realized there and then was that what I was pursuing at that moment was a personal project. I began to consider the implications of humans pursuing personal projects in their lives—everyday pursuits that are trivial or transformative, singular or communal, brief encounters or enduring commitments. The concept of personal projects allowed me to bring together both the inner maps that personal constructs provide and the outer ecology of possibilities, like the off-ramps, cul-de-sacs, and open highways that formed the route I was taking. (c)
Q:
Personal projects are not limited to formal projects that are required of us, such as getting Mom into a good nursing home, although sometimes we pursue them out of a sense of duty. They are also, crucially, acts we gladly choose. Toddlers are pursuing projects when they toddle, and so are lovers when they love. I am certain that our cat has a project when she stalks, pounces, and sits atop our other cat, purring.
Q:
Personal projects are extended sets of personally salient action in context. Let’s parse this definition. Personal: Personal projects are framed through the idiosyncratic lens of the project pursuer. We can’t simply watch you build a tree house, or train for a marathon, and surmise what the pursuit of your personal project says about you. In order to truly understand, we need to ask you the question crucial to revealing your idiogenic nature: What do you think you’re doing? In other words, what does this mean to you? The answer is often surprising. (c)
Q:
Somebody observing you right now might infer that you are reading a book. But you know better. You are barely registering the words in front of you because your personal project is actually “appearing to be independent and self-confident so no one will ask why I am alone on this cruise ship.” Your reading behavior is actually a decoy that helps you cope with your rapidly changing answer to the questions “Who are you?” (a recovering romantic) and “How are you doing?” (not bad considering the breakup). (c)
Q:
As you might expect, those high in conscientiousness rate their academic and work projects more positively, and see these projects as meaningful and efficacious: they get things done and feel good about getting things done. If you are conscientious, you have a trick that helps make you efficacious and positive—you can spin mundane tasks into enjoyable ones. For example, a numbingly boring task can be made more interesting by transforming it into a game where you pit yourself against an imagined opposition or even your previous self of yesterday. Even if you are not so conscientious, this strategy can help you get through a long to-do list. (c)
Q:
Consider having a job as a flight attendant or a debt collector. Each has an associated personal style that may or may not align with the biogenic personalities of those who work those jobs. A grumpy, taciturn, impatient flight attendant isn’t going to last, nor is a sweet, engaging, and forgiving bill collector. But a person who is not biogenically suited to a certain role may still desire to fill it. So to survive in their fields, they become site-specific free-trait adopters. At first this can be difficult, but during the course of developing their occupations, they practice again and again until it becomes more natural. Though seasoned travelers might be able to spot them, pseudo-hospitable flight attendants are generally able to pass. Their professional roles matter to them. (c)
Q:
Acting out of character—and against one’s first nature—can be psychologically and physiologically depleting. So how do we recharge after the stressful effects of free-trait behavior? By finding or creating the right environment, or what I call a restorative niche, to reconnect with our biogenic selves and prevent burnout, which is key to the success of any personal project. (c)
Q:
However, introverts preferred to go to lunch alone or with a maximum of one or two colleagues, while extraverts on average reported eating with four others. One extreme participant listed having eighty lunch partners! (c)
Q:
during breaks, I will retreat to my office, or the men’s room, or occasionally a broom closet, in order to give a lucid second half to my lecture. Once, I inadvertently locked myself in the closet. That restorative niche didn’t restore me for long. (c)
Q:
I imagine this “fake it till you make it” strategy can, at first blush, feel disingenuous to some. But I believe that changing your personality to match different situations isn’t inauthentic at all. Here’s why: Calls for total authenticity rest on the assumption that any outward behavior that’s out of sync with our inward feelings is dishonest. Free traits, from this perspective, are lies. But I urge you to question that very assumption. Restricting ourselves to being only oneself can forestall the possibility of being something more.
I suspect that some of you might generally agree with the notion that always being “you” is constraining and limits our capacity for growth. Others, however, will be very uncomfortable with this idea. So it is helpful here to consider another trait of personality that clarifies whether you are sympathetic to the notion of multiple authenticities. (c)
Q:
... imagine you’re a low self-monitor in a relationship with a high self-monitor. Your partner, from your perspective, is a bit of a stand-up chameleon. She appears to be different people in different situations—a corporate self, a party self, a playing-with-the-kids self, and you end up being confused. Who is this person to whom I’m so committed? Which of the many hers am I really in love with? And when your partner looks at you, there is also confusion but a very different kind. You are seen as constant and predictable, which certainly has its comforts. But that constancy can be seen as rather boring and, worse, unduly rigid. Why can’t you be flexible and accommodate to the situation? It’s a dinner party! Couldn’t you just submit to the fun of the situation and be a tiny bit playful for one evening instead of expatiating, repeatedly, on the fiscal benefits of a flat tax? (c)
Q:
When we see the complete social-ecological picture of who we are, it becomes clear that we can have multiple authenticities. And it’s natural for some of those authenticities to conflict. This does not mean we are adrift in a world of moral relativism but simply that there is more than one way of being a good person—and, crucially, of becoming a better person. It is by acknowledging all of our selves and adaptively weighing and rebalancing them that we can be truly authentic. Then we can best understand who we are and how best to engage our complex lives with integrity. (с)
I need to bold this, it's so good!
Q:
Amid all this conscious shaping of our future prospects, there also needs to be room for serendipity in our lives. We must be alive to new encounters, open to being gobsmacked by something that brings unexpected delight. Such lightness, I believe, is essential to ensuring the sustainable pursuit of our deepest concerns—and to developing new ones. It is what allows our humanity to shine through.
It is entirely possible to pursue our projects conscientiously while being receptive to chance. So hone your skills as the athlete you always dreamed of becoming, but be ready to change course if you begin to demonstrate a strong passion for science. Keep writing your book of poetry, but seize the opportunity when an editor asks you to write an article on classical music. Plan your long-awaited trip to Vegas, but make the most of a night in Chicago when your flight is delayed. It is ultimately the marriage of these two approaches that makes life deeply fulfilling.
Go forth and pursue your projects. Make them meaningful and manageable, and connected to others. Let them harmonize with your essential nature wherever they can, and provide yourself a chance to recuperate when they demand that you act out of character for a while. Where society and culture support your efforts, embrace that boost; where they interfere, consider pressing society and culture to change. But while you’re at it, now and again remember to release the sense of pursuit. Relax into the spontaneity of the moment, whatever it is. This lightness, this easing back, is essential if we are to carry on at all. Whimsy and humor can sustain us through the demanding pursuits of core projects, so encourage them. Loosen up. Maybe you could start by trying to lick your elbow. Or, even better, getting someone else to lick it. (c)