This novel continues the current season of Doctor Who's examination of the "human factor" in the Doctor's travels, though while the television show seems to look largely at how the Doctor impacts her companions, this one is about literal god-building. There have been a few stories in the past that have dealt with the Doctor's mythologizing factor - The Face of Evil being perhaps the first, though it was a fairly common theme in the Eleventh Doctor years - but not many, if any, have focused on it quite so directly as here. The Doctor and her companions - Graham, Ryan, and Yaz - broker a peace treaty between human settlers and a canine-like species (the Loba) on a distant planet. When they return to that planet 600-years-later (a TARDIS-whoopsy just trying to get Ryan back his dropped cell-phone), they find the TARDIS (now known as the Tordis) and the "Good Doctor" have become central figures in a religion that is gripping the planet and driving the enslavement of the Loba and the punishment of heretics. Graham, a retired bus driver, is the one proclaimed to be the "Good Doctor" and a throwaway line about dogs being a man's best friend are cited as proof that Loba are meant to be human servants.
From this point, the story progresses in much the way any Doctor Who story will: there are capturings and misunderstandings and bad people and good people and allies and enemies and scrambles through tunnels/sewers/hallways and chase scenes and cliffhangers. There is virtually nothing new from the action of the plot and either you like the handful of shapes that Who story takes or you don't, and if you don't, then you probably won't be picking this book up.
However, the book's primary injection into the Whoniverse is a detailed focus on the question of, "What comes after?" How many times has the Doctor saved the day and left without a word? And how many times does that victory hold? Does that no-longer-doomed colony keep up the good work, that no-longer-doomed wo/man stay on the path of righteousness? The greatest fantasy of Who is that, more often than not, a single visit from the Doctor is enough to alter the course of history to the positive, but considering that the bulk of the Doctor's adventures have been on Earth (and the Terrestrial Disasopora), and that s/he has to keep coming back to save the day and right wrongs, clearly that is not the case. A colony barely surviving an invasion/plague/dictator is still going to have to hard-scrabble for maybe generations (and at least years) to fix all the damage done. Times of empty are a hard thing to overcome, even for the hopeful. Surely, some of those colonies turned to strong-but-amoral leaders or to barbarianism or to treaties with other potential invaders just to survive.
This is general an important slice of Whovian philosophy. Juno Dawson is doing good work getting there.
The flaw of her storytelling, perhaps, is two-fold. First, the religion of the "Good Doctor" tries not at all to be any different than Catholicism (blended with a few bits of other religions, but not too cleverly), especially the flavor Catholicism took a few centuries ago. This means, the main critique isn't necessarily on the Doctor and her general hubris and never-look-back attitude, her responsibility for violating the first rule of the Time Lords, but on a religious extremism: belief in a second coming and in Heaven and the religious justification of slavery and violence. These are things worth a poke and a prod and even an angry retort, sure, but it bruises the thoughtfulness of the tale by diluting it. By the time the Doctor faces her ghosts, the book only has a couple of pages to deal with the Doctor's feelings about this. It gets some points back by also critiquing the violence of the rebellion against the church, but the "easy" set-up of having virtually everyone be in the wrong and unable to help themselves without the Doctor's second intervention feels a bit of a cop-out.
The second flaw is more minor, and that's the fact that very little of the religion is actually based on the Doctor and his/her mythos. Sure, there is the Tordis and the concept of flying through time and space, but outside of Graham's immensely misrepresented line, it is just old-school Catholicism created whole cloth and stapled around a couple of trappings. It would definitely been more "fun" had the religion been more a direct perversion of the Doctor's actions and words.
Still, a good book and nice kick off of the new series of books. And it fits perfectly into the Chibnall era by hinting at other adventures unnamed (Moffat and Chibnall have both done a good job of seeding gaps in the storyline, of making us feel like we are only touching random bits of a much more epic story...and perhaps opening the door for Big Finish to come in). The companions are a little underdeveloped (as happens with novels written before the show even hits the screens) but that sometimes leads to us getting a slightly different take on them. Graham is a bit more...forceful, maybe...and the Doctor and Yazmin seem a bit more close.
And to end this review on one of the highlights, let us take a look at the obvious element in the room. The religion of the Good Doctor is predicated on the Doctor being male, and holds that females are a weaker sex (and note, when the religion latches on to one of them being the Good Doctor, it is the older, white male and not the younger black man). While clearly this is a bit of irony and a shout out to Christianity's downplay of important females (in the Bible and beyond), it also makes a nice jab towards a lot of the pre-critique of Whitaker...that she is a pretender to the throne. Dawson directly attacks these claims with a very-nearly-fourth-wall-breaking section:
"A woman?"
"Indeed."
"And how do you know she's lying? You said yourself the Good Doctor's return was foretold. Maybe the outward appearance -"
"He would return as a man!"