Are We Prepared For Commerce In the Near Future?
Artificial Intelligence is here. It is a part of the US Military - drones. It is a part of our entertainment - from offering customized recommendations on Friday night movies (as in the case of Netflix) to delivering sports match highlights during live TV coverage. It is in our healthcare at the basic level of monitoring and alerting and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) backed by artificial intelligence could restore those fundamental experiences to those who feared them lost forever. It is in our communication - social media is a playground for bot creators, and while it really isn't AI just yet, we are fast approaching a time when the bot sequence (messaging sequence in response to an inquiry or keyword or phrase) will learn from each encounter with a human and be able to make a decision about how to engage further with the human. It is in our financial districts - used to predict moves in the stock market. It is the search engine of the internet, Google - creating and refining semantic. At this point, to most of us, it appears that AI is being used at the basic level, with some applications allowing for decision making and learning as each encounter is recorded and analyzed by the computer program (think self-driving cars). More importantly, I believe it is vital that we understand that there is no Standard of Ethics being used by the creators, the makers, of AI programs.
Which is why I am so glad that Jim Blasingame wrote The 3rd Ingredient, The Journey of Analog Ethics into the World of Digital Fear and Greed. He is concerned about the ethics of the makers of AI and the users - not the ethics of the program itself (though that is an idea being explored by others), and is concerned about you and me as the partner/user. His unique style of telling the history of commerce between humans, the development of trust, and setting of standards for commerce helped me to visualize the intangibles of Faith, Trust, and Ethics. Until recently in our human history, each transaction in commerce occurred between humans. We could 'read' the other person's body language, we could discern whether or not we were dealing with someone who 'spoke our language' in terms of culture and experiences, while trusting ourselves to know whether or not they were shysters or simply experienced negotiators. As time passes, we are able to adjust to the introduction of new ways of completing transactions and new monetary offerings.
Now add digital communications and commerce. There is a level of unease and distrust among the general population and it is based on the 'not knowing' if their information is safe in the realm of Privacy. Humans bring their analog selves - their emotions, their experiences, their knowledge - to the interaction, while AI and computer programs bring only the facts and cold Do This/Do That/If This/Then That. Here's the rub...we humans are currently changing our views on the use of AI and how we interact with it, dangerously close to leaving our analog ethics behind. We are adjusting to the Digital World, not making the Digital World adjust to us. What does the new world look like? The world of Humans with Digital Ethics? Jim answers that question while offering up the knowledge that we humans still have control of how we develop our Digital Ethics.
The book is an excellent starting point for discussions between makers and programmers and users. And a reminder that we humans need to be vigilant in our understanding of the world beyond our individual experiences, because it is we who are in control today and that means we are the ones who determine our future.