One of the many books published on the back of Britain's exit from the European Union, this is a decent primer on post-Agreement Northern Ireland, looking into specific areas of contestation and controversy in the first two decades of peace - for example, policing, historical justice, women, and the larger constitutional issues thrown up by the EU exit. But the book is marred by significant oversights, particularly in its historical overview, that somewhat disbalance history in favour (ironically, given Fenton is a former Sinn Fein advisor) of the Unionist community.
Fenton's book is also one in a line of emerging studies that offer a much more critical look at the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement, its aftermath and its limitations. She is clear, of course, that the Agreement was largely successful in ending violence in Northern Ireland after four decades of routine violence, and aimed at redressing eight decades of structural imbalance that had favoured the Unionist-Protestant majority. As Fenton argues in the opening pages, 'Northern Ireland's story did not end in 1998. Arguably, it only entered a different phase of complexity. While the society is no longer engulfed in violent conflict [...] Northern Ireland continues to be home to a deeply unsettled and divided region' (pp.3-4).
None of this, of course, means she regards the GFA as a failure, but rather than the 'peace process is far from resolved and [...] the progress in the region has been hampered by an unwillingness both locally and internationally to look squarely at the kind of peace we have, on what it is based and where it is going' (p.8). Indeed, the road to peace was far from smooth and, in a fact Fenton disregards entirely, further specifics had to be hashed out as part of the St Andrews Agreement in 2006.
Regrettably, this is not the only key omission in the book. In the historical overview near the beginning, in a section headed "The Birth of Northern Ireland", Fenton makes the outrageously misleading assertion that those Protestants/Unionists who took steps to secure Protestant supremacy 'did so in good faith' (p.21). Obviously there is only so much you can discuss in a short historical chapter, but the discussion completely omits any mention of the long war of attrition fostered by the Orangist movement against Home Rule, gunrunning (supported by the UK Conservative Party), and the state-supported repression by the British military apparatus. This is compounded by a total lack of discussion of the Civil Authorities Act, the fundamental piece of legislation that - along with those elements above - all sowed what Fenton calls 'the seeds of long-term alienation and division which eventually sparked the conflict' (p.21). If gunrunning might be overlooked, the failure to mention the Civil Authorities Act is much more significant, given it was this act that provided the power to intern without trial.
Furthermore, while Fenton sets out how the new Northern Irish statement gerrymandered electoral districts in order to cement Unionist ascendency, she does not acknowledge the fact that the entire Northern Irish region was effectively a large exercise in gerrymandering. As scholars like Tonge, Fitzpatrick, and TG Fraser have all shown, there was - in fact - quite an extensive debate within Unionist circles as to the precise boundaries of Northern Ireland (one proposal comprised all nine Ulster counties "nine-countyism"). Fenton also makes the sloppy error in claiming on page 33 that the loyalist paramilitary groups formed with a view to protecting against IRA violence. But this does not make sense, as the UVF (for example) formed in 1966, at which time the IRA posed very little threat of violence. It was 3 years later, following incidents like the Battle of the Bogside, that the Provisional IRA embarked upon its infamous armed campaign.
The space dedicated to exploring the role of the NI Women's Coalition in the Peace Process, however, is to be commended, and the discussion on contemporary issues in the book is much more fruitful than the historical sections. She challenges the prevailing narrative that cold case investigations disproportionately focus on military personnel, and offers a compassionate (albeit now dated) look at abortion access in the territory.
Despite its very serious limitations and oversights, the book does largely succeed in one of Fenton's primary aims - to reinvigorate debate on a too-long neglected part of the UK and its history.