It’s okay; a pretty alright-at-best book. Which I guess is good when compared to my review of his first Gotham novel, but I guess I was too hopeful and expecting too much from it, but when something seems to have a direct (maybe unintended) reference to Shrek and meme culture— how could it not be good?: “[Bruce] was like an onion. He had lots of layers and Selina enjoyed peeling them off one by one, trying to reveal the real Bruce Wayne buried deep inside.”
On a more serious note regarding expectations, sure I went in with low expectations (I expected the writing to be poor and for the most part let it slide aside from using the phrase “collateral damage” too much) but I still had expectations. The novel follows the second season of Gotham, which ends with a bunch of monsters escaping from Hugo Strange, and picks up directly after. And then... “Five Months Later.” Really? You have the chance to show interesting character development but you skip to what happens just before the third season begins? It would have been nice to see how these characters became what they are now (like how Gordon became a bounty hunter).
Here’s the reason for that. Similar to the first novel, there’s a lot more telling and not showing; however, since this takes place after several seasons, we get tons of explanatory exposition— especially in the front of the novel— as if we know nothing about the events that already transpired. I guess this is a good thing for the five people in the world who are reading this book without having seen a single episode.
But ultimately the thing about the novel is, it’s riddled with missed opportunities— namely with character development. Yes, like the jump with Gordon mentioned above, and with Harvey (who’s a lot more bearable in this one than the first book), I get that he wants to be apart of the case and not stay in his office off in the sidelines, but to grab a rookie and then name him his partner and then tell him it’s risky being his partner because all his partners wind up dead... that’s awkward and frankly a little weird. Harvey is the Captain and technically the rookie isn’t his partner. But there are more problematic issues at large, and I guess this is a slight spoiler depending on how much you read into this (so just skip to the next paragraph if you want to avoid that possibility). You know that characters created for the book ain’t making it to the next season (especially if you’ve seen the next season), so as a writer, you are thrown to a corner because no matter what characters you come up with and write about, they won’t even be a thought in the next season. In the last novel this was tied to the overall plot, while here it appears that Starr has learned a bit by making it feel like everything that happened had lasting repercussions— except maybe that shoehorned interlude with Alfred and Bruce.
Very negative, I know, but in comparison to Gotham: Dawn of Darkness, this isn’t a complete dumpster fire. There are a couple pros— like most of the characters seem to have the spirit of their television show counterparts, or that the inciting mystery was a lot more interesting this time around. But the cons outweigh the pros, and there are a lot more cons other than say the lack of different characters (like really, no one from the rogues gallery?). Just look at the rest of the review. Not a must read, but it holds its own as a novel one could hypothetical use to read to pass time. Other than that, just watch the show.