The following is what I wrote for the book club that had me reading The Dance of the Dissident Daughter. Beneath it, also in italics is an added paragraph..
I did finish the book but it was a hard slog to do it. I'd read a paragraph and by the end of it couldn't recall exactly what the first part of the paragraph was. I couldn't stop thinking how nice it was for her to be able to take all those trips, not only the more local retreats to her circle of trees but all over the country and abroad. I was never clear exactly on what the husband did for a living - minister I think was mentioned at one point, associated with a college/university in some capacity at another - but whatever he did, between their two jobs, she was certainly able to travel to a lot of nice places. Some of the workshops and retreats mentioned were job related and she was probably comped in some way for them but many were not and over the course of the several years of her "journey" the woman did a heck of a lot of traveling, even if only for weekend getaways.
I thought it ever so convenient that she'd mention a certain symbol as showing up in her dreams and oh, by the way, she'd read at least one other book on the sacred feminine that was all about that particular symbol... and oh yeah, read it before that symbol started showing up in the dreams. If I followed her discourse time and again on such events, she'd read a book or several books with information about a particular symbol showing up in dreams and how it relates to the sacred feminine and then she'd start having dreams with that exact symbol. As I said, seemed rather convenient for her in terms of relating how her journey evolved and progressed.
I also found it convenient that just when she's searching for an example to give of patriarchal oppression she suddenly remembered something from childhood that fits perfectly into her scenario. The same is true of conversations over the years with others at workshops or from daily life or from church settings. Some of these incidents when recalled made her angry or in need of sitting down and sobbing yet at the time many of them occurred she didn't seem to find anything oppressing or anger inducing. Maybe she wasn't happy with how the conversation went but that's different from finding the situation oppressing.
I hated how she wrote as if certain things are fact and apply to everyone. Just because I might dream about a labrynth doesn't mean I am having a dream symbol relating to the sacred feminine and wombs. Labrynths or mazes in dreams can be about searching for the solution to a problem, about feeling lost and confused, or like a rat running around in a maze. Sometimes, it's just a labrynth. Not every single thing in a dream is a symbol.
She states as if fact some of the information about Ariadne from the Theseus and the Minotaur myth. Some of that information is theory and supposition. I really dislike it when someone states theories and suppositions as fact. Kidd really should have stated as much. Would it really have been so difficult or taken away from her narrative to have said that based on archaeological evidence or on the works of Plutarch or whatever that Ariadne is theorized to have been a goddess in her own right? Kidd does this throughout the book. Take something that's supposition or theory and state it as infallible fact. If this were a work of fiction, then fine, take something and put a particular spin on it for story purposes. Don't do that with non-fiction.
The whole episode in Crete emerging from the cave with the pronouncements of, "It's a girl!" I found laughable, and not in a good way. It seemed contrived and over the top silly. That said, I don't want to demean or belittle whatever genuine experience any of those women had. If for them they found the experience of emerging from the cave as some sort of spiritual or feminine rebirth then more power to them. Kidd's description of it after going on and on and on about caves and labrynths and being reborn made the whole thing come across as trite and comical to me.
I agree with others that Kidd was having some sort of mid-life crisis and based on a number of things she wrote I would say that part of the crisis was already being depressed. She mentions becoming depressed over certain things as she "awakened" and began this inner journey of hers but I think she was already in a somewhat depressed state. Her reaction to certain events, conversations, attitudes of others, etc point in that direction. Where others might have been peeved over something, Kidd was having out and out mini breakdowns, throwing objects, sobbing, getting good and truly angry.
I do think part of her mid-life crisis was a crisis of faith in her church and the church leaders but I do think there was so much more going on, such as being depressed and not really being aware of it, that led her to have this sudden light bulb moment about how she was being oppressed by a patriarchal church and a patriarchal society. I think she was experience dissatisfaction in her marriage already, which added to the depression and lack of faith in the church.
Kidd wrote about how women put their lifes on the back burner for their families. That's true. In many families the needs of Mom come last. Some women are fine with that. Some are not. Of those who are not, some speak up right away and establish a more balanced way of doing things. Others stay silent for years with some finally reaching a breaking point. Sounds to me like that's what happened with Kidd. She got tired of things being one way for her husband but another way for her. He could announce that he was going away on business in two weeks and that would be that. On the other hand, when she needed to go out of town it became a big production of okaying it with him first, checking schedules for conflicts, arranging meals, making sure her husband knew what was going on in the kids' lives and so on. Kidd finally got tired of that and it came as part of this mid-life crisis, awakening, whatever you want to call it.
That leads me to point out that Kidd could be sometimes contraditory. Through the book she talks about a woman seeking permission, of needing permission, of looking to others to find out this or that was all right yet at other times she says a woman doesn't need permission of others, she doesn't need approval from a husband, father, best friend, or whomever. I found this contradiction annoying.
Also annoying was how she presented everything as being true for all women. All women who seek the sacred feminine will do this and then they will do this and then blah blah blah. It's another example, really, of her being contraditory because at times, particularly early in the book, she states that this was the evolution of her journey and she can't really speak to how the journey for others will go.
Now, all the rambling to this point aside, I could see her point and even empathize on certain things. What mature woman would want to witness two older men leering at a teenage girl working to stock shelves and hear them say that's how they like their women, on their knees? I would have found that offensive so I can well imagine how Kidd must have felt as the mother of that teen.
I think most women are well aware of the male oriented world with men still making more for the same jobs as women, of the lack of women in all aspects of politics and higher ranking corporate jobs, and within church organizations. I do not think that these days it's something women are blind too even though that's sometimes the way Kidd's writing came off to me. That is, she's going along, minding her own business then one day, BAM, it hits her. Men tend to dominate and don't like letting women have control of anything.
That might have been the case at one time with culture and society here in the US but nowadays any woman who isn't aware that women are still having to fight for equal rights in and out of the home has been off living in that cave like labrynth methinks.
All right, I could go on even more but I'm thinking y'all have a good idea on my overall thoughts and opinions of this book now. *LOL*
Okay, now for that added paragraph.
I wanted to also say that I do think that Kidd underwent something. I also think that the women she talks about had an experience that helped them each grow as a person. I don't wish from the above to make it seem as though I think it's all a load of hooey. I do believe in things like symbolism in dreams and seeing something spiritual all around us that can have a profound impact on someone's life. I did not like the book because of the manner in which things were presented. I didn't care at all for how Kidd often implies and sometimes out right writes that her experience is one that applies to all women nor did I like how at times she states something as fact when it is not yet never states that it's her opinion or someone else's opinion. To say the least I did not find this book fulfulling or freeing. For those who have, it's wonderful that the book speaks to you in such a way. Even if only one person had gotten something positive from the book, then Kidd did what she set out to do by sharing her spiritual journey.