I always have mixed feelings about books on merger arbitrage. I’ve been a merger arbitrageur for nearly 20 years, it is my profession, so I’m curious; but books on the topic make me nervous. The more people that know what I do, the more ‘crowded’ my trades could become, which reduces the profits that I can earn. Think of it as a fixed pie shared by an increasing number of people. My expectations for the book were high as Mario Gabelli is one of the deans of the industry, but overall the book is a disappointment. The introduction by Gabelli and conversations with Clint Carlson, James Dinan (York Capital), the Westchester Capital guys, and Drew Figdor of TIG all contain nuggets of insight worth reading, but the bulk of the interviews were with yesterday’s men. Men, generally, (I think there were two women profiled) who made a killing in the 1990s or earlier when the space was much less competitive and everyone involved earned exceptional returns, oftentimes illegally. Most of these players are out of the game now. We’re missing the perspectives of the current giants in the industry: hedge funds like Pentwater, Magnetar, or more systematic practitioners like CNH (AQR). How have these funds grown and thrived when most of these ‘legends’ have packed it in?
I was also particularly irked by the second appendix which runs for 67 pages and contains the terms and returns for more than a hundred randomly chosen deals since 2007. It’s obviously filler as there is no logic or purpose for the sample set chosen: it’s neither complete nor representative of the range of payouts one can expect from merger arbitrage. It just makes a 300 page book 367 pages long. To conclude, the book is dated, padded and misleading, but rather than feel resentful, I’m thankful, as it’s hard to imagine it inspiring anyone to start trading merger arbitrage if they are not already.