The so-called 'New Perspective' suggests that traditional Protestant understandings of Paul, shaped by the Reformation, need revising-in particular the contrast between faith and works. This clear study outlines fundamental aspects of the New Perspective, evaluates whether it is a threat or a help, and sets out a fresh understanding of Paul and his theology. It's an essential guide for anyone wanting to get to grips with Paul's teaching in the light of recent study.
Superb brief introduction to the major figures of the New Perspective movement(s). Very helpful for those seeking an overview of the major players that can be read in the span of about an hour and a half.
This is a great place to start for anyone looking to learn more about the new perspective on Paul. It is also helpful in defining a more nuanced relationship between the law of Moses, morality (particularly love), and faith, as opposed to the more reformational understanding of moral works and faith being opposed to one another (which is so clearly not taught in the New Testament!). I’m overall intrigued by this “new perspective,” and I’m excited to dig more into it. I’m by no means sold to this point of view after reading a 28 page book, but I do see the value in the NP, similar to Thompson.
Good and concise guide to get an overview on the New Perspective on Paul. Thompson manages to cover the essentials and present the key ideas in the NP. I am still not quite clear as to the place of works in the NP, neither can I say that I exactly know as to how this links with the Reformers. Thompson wants to argue that the NP can be in line with Luther and Calvin and that the NP does not mean that salvation is through works. But NT Wright in his book Justification (importantly that had not yet been published or written at the time of this booklet!) appears to have little qualms in saying that he diverts from the Reformers' views on work. Am I misunderstanding something here?