What began as an interesting look at the classic (and how it retains an essential part while being able to change throughout time) turned into a discussion on how books are better when they're so broad that anyone can get anything out of them. I've never been a fan of the "something that can mean anything is good" theory (thus my dislike of most things modern in the art world), and having someone try and prove it to me while diverging from a really interesting beginning just wasn't all that fun.