This was a great read, about a person that slowly sharpen his ideas, make his opinions evolve, and keep his eyes on the future already at hand. The story of Trudeau here talks of threading lightly on the promises of ideals, the danger of malformed identity, and upbringing of the modern nation.
Review
This book is mainly based on the preserved writing and documents concerning Trudeau, which were surprinsgly well preserved for most of it : his drafts, correspondences and so on. The author decided to stay close to this material, make it clear when he speculate on Trudeau state of mind or train of though when he have, and show concrete reason to do so. Additionally, he successfully makes efforts to replace those elements in their historical context. The psychological close-up of the man, his experiences, the political opinion surrounding him and coming from him, and the historical context, in the end all come together to make us understand well the life of Trudeau, that we agree or not with his opinion. This book is also apolitical, exposing only the train of thought of its subject, without making them as facts of life. Therefore it succeed in staying reasonably objective.
The only negative criticism i had to make was regarding the technical aspect of the writing, which had some faults. For examples, some elements was presented in some paragraphs, without taking place, but resurfaced later on like it was the first time they were exposed. At other times, maybe trying to stay as objective as possible or staying true to the facts, the writing seemed dry to me.
Resume
Trudeau have a mixed upbrining, being exposed early to the english language and manners through his mother's anglophone heritage and some of his education, and french-canadian heritage through his father, in which he will still spend most of his early education. However he definitly found himself more close to the latest, greatyl due to his catholic faith. He also shared the strong desire and aspiration for a french catholic state in his youth, reflecting his identity at the time. AS the book show later on, this aspiration will come to radically changed aloong his identity and nuanced view of the world. He was exposed early by some of his mentor to unorthodox thinking, and encouraged to experiment with different opinions.
The first major change seemed to have come during his study at Harvard, during which he shared with the world the discorvery of the Holocaust horror perpetuated in the name of nazi nationalism. This realization made him think on how Quebec was missing out on the world moving on, by its focus on its nationalism ( that was specifically conservative and religious at the time, and did not welcome the exterior world).
During his travels around the world and his encounters, Trudeau exposed himself to the many questions of identity politics, nationalism, decolonizations, revolutions, and the role of the states toward its citizens, either through socialism or US capitalism. On this, the basis of his thinking began to found strengh : before any ideology, a individual need to be fed and attain a certain well-being. Any ideology or political system that fail at this cannot be sustainable. This view kept him open on the freedom offered by capitalism, but also the security offered by a more socialist state; on the value of personal identity, faith and beliefs but also on the trappings of such identity in ideologies for one's own sakes.
Trudeau then was in search for pragmatical politics, during which came his second big transformation while working at the Privy Council Office in Ottawa. He got familiar with canadian federalism and politics between provinces. He saw their limits, but also their potential as framework that could offer to each provinces the freedom of enacting their identity while still opening them to a modern world. Trudeau was wary of the insecurities thet were maintained to legitimate nationalism sentiment, and how those could lead to revolution without progress by forcing the nations to close on themselves, avoiding exchange and evolution in their ideas. Such was the Quebec nationalist and sovereign movement when he found himself confronting them.
Despite his own identity as catholic and french canadian, Trudeau tried not to lose his principle to what was to him ''emotional arguments'', and slowly articulated his vision for the future of Canada, where anglophone and quebecois ''nations'' would both mutually benefits and expand their horizons, instead of closing of each other.
Political context and incidence of history end up giving a remarkable opportunity to Trudeau, who ended up being the right person at the right place at the right time. That moment materialized not through the NPD, the political party he would have favoured, but the liberal party who was at the other end of so many of his criticism. THere he launched his campaign which will lead him to establish the foundation of Modern canada as we know it today.