Fantasy and mild horror. Well written -- oftentimes when pick up its easy enough to keep reading for a while, though some of those times for me personally there's not much motivation in my picking it up (apart from that it's the only fantasy book I've got round at the moment).
Thing wrote after the first 50 pages because I felt like chuntering on, but the gist is more applicable to girlish fantasy (dolls, horses, crafts, steady, emotional, child-hood fantasy world that can't be taken as real, post-divorce main character, solid female friend) indulgence, it then gets a bit more `twisted'/darker later on...
Personally I got a bit fed-up of/worn-out from the back and forward between numerous aspects (prospective partners/sexual relationships, motivations for more than one character, nature of certain objects and the world in the story) 'its bad' or 'its good' and variations on it, flipping from one to the other more than once for each aspect. But I'm sure some would love it. Ultimately there seems little of bite for me personally (interesting perspectives, interpretations, snip-its,....), but I know sometimes it's more the entertainment/thrill value than that that people read -- which is fine. But I felt 2 was being a little mean given execution of its plot/... S0 3 it was.... 2.5, maybe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Picked it up in a second hand bookshop. Honestly, I probably wouldn't have bought it online with the access to the plethora of information it gives (that the author writes *gasp* vampire novels *gasp* would have been extremely off-putting for me).
I think, generally speaking, it suits female readers better; particularly females with some inner girlish fantasy awaiting some indulgence; perhaps that which maturity and reality as they so have unraveled through life have tended to push or yell 'shut up' to in the numerous forms that 'girlish fantasy' can take. The main character fits that description both in the more normal ways that hit people and it seems in a more fantastic than normal way. There is a central female friendship.
Why do I presently think it suits such readers better? The combination of it appearing to indulge some inner childish fantasy (or has elements that you'd see in children's' fantasy), the fact that the main character is who she is, and there is that central female friendship... The nature of a close female, supporting friendship is something that might be difficult for a standard chap to latch on to (though I might be wrong in that assertion): research suggests that women spend a lot longer grieving such a friendship when it is broken than a male partner (yes, when they are heterosexual). It could be generally similar for males for all I know (indeed I'm sure there are cases where it has been the same for males)... It just seems to be a set-up that generally speaking females would empathize and identify with more. Anyway, that explanation aside....
It seems to be suiting my mood -- I wouldn't have read the first 50 pages without getting restless otherwise. Perhaps, I have some inner fancy (perhaps in particular one that should not be) that has been too much denied that makes it suits it more *shrugs*... Personal contemplation aside... If further reading warrants an edit of this, then I'll edit it. At the moment its 3 stars because it seems more in the realms of an indulgent flick rather that uses not particularly unusual or new elements (if a competently written one -- which is important) than something to arouse more excitement.
Apologies for the length. Don't let the fact that she writes vampire novels put you off if your mood seems to call to it given what is stated in this review (or if you are a chap and it seems to also!).