A product of its time, the collection asks a wonderful array of questions without providing too many specific answers. Emerging from the dogmatism of GLF's politics, this may have been a welcome change of scenery. For a 21st century queer intellectually bludgeoned by endless, useless postmodernist complications, this was a bit of a letdown.
For me, the biggest takeaway was that oppressed groups should retain autonomous spaces/organizations that speak to their own oppression in all of its intricacies and contradictions. From there, they should engage with the overarching framework of the Left to authentically challenge capitalism. Caucuses within existing left-wing organizations feel insufficient, while an over-emphasis on autonomy leads to easy co-optation by capitalism. One author made the point that while queer people are overwhelmingly working class, the so-called gay community and gay culture are rooted in the middle class; this contradiction can't be bridged by shame and guilt alone. There should be breathing room in some spheres to articulate an unapologetic queerness that transcends party discipline. "Apolitical" gay culture persists for a reason and part of that reason is its insistence on the validity of joy, pleasure and desire.
I particularly loved the essay on traditional vs. radical gay culture and its political ramifications, as well as the personal accounts describing individuals' burgeoning lesbian consciousnesses. On a whole, the collection was full of serious pieces that dealt with complicated emotional, intellectual and political issues.