Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Mapping the Heavens

Rate this book
Throughout history people have sought ways in which to map the heavens. From the sources of mathematics and mythology sprang the classic star chart, the finest examples of which are both scientific documents and works of art.

In this beautifully illustrated book, Peter Whitfield reveals some of the ways in which the structure of the universe has been conceived, explained and depicted. With examples ranging from the Stone Age to the Space Age - ancient observatories, the angelic visions of Dante, images from the Copernican revolution, the rationalized heavens of Isaac Newton, and modern deep space technology - Whitfield offers a challenging exploration of the tension between rigorous scientific knowledge and the continuing search for cause, certainty and harmony in the universe.

This new edition is updated to include a wider range of stunning maps of the skies in full colour, including imagery from the latest voyages of space exploration.

192 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1995

44 people want to read

About the author

Peter Whitfield

70 books11 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
5 (41%)
4 stars
4 (33%)
3 stars
3 (25%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Alan.
36 reviews6 followers
March 7, 2022
Undoubtedly this is an impressive book, and you'll find pictures here from both western and eastern astronomers that you're unlikely to find anywhere else. The balanced description of our understanding of the heavens across multiple cultures is nice to read, along with early contributions of the southern hemisphere.

The pictures are beautiful and impressive, some of the line drawings alone make this a unique volume.

Where the book falls down slightly is the dryness and repetition. The dryness comes from being too factual, repetitive with it, and not consistenly following the overall narrative of the section. It's as if the different sections were written by different people, who all (fairly) want to cover some basic ground so as not to assume, and yet the editor failed to read the book as a whole. Hence some going back and forth over previous ground.

If you're after a more readable and friendly coverage of the same topic, give Anne Rooney's Mapping the Universe: Exploring and Chronicling the Cosmos a go first. More eye friendly, and you can always refer back to Mapping the Heavens for a bit more detail.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.