Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages

Rate this book
In this, his final book, Erich Auerbach writes, "My purpose is always to write history." Tracing the transformations of classical Latin rhetoric from late antiquity to the modern era, he explores major concerns raised in his Mimesis: the historical and social contexts in which writings were received, and issues of aesthetics, semantics, stylistics, and sociology that anticipate the concerns of the new historicism.In this, his final book, Erich Auerbach writes, "My purpose is always to write history." Tracing the transformations of classical Latin rhetoric from late antiquity to the modern era, he explores major concerns raised in his Mimesis: the historical and social contexts in which writings were received, and issues of aesthetics, semantics, stylistics, and sociology that anticipate the concerns of the new historicism.

456 pages, Paperback

First published March 21, 1965

2 people are currently reading
182 people want to read

About the author

Erich Auerbach

64 books128 followers
German philologist Erich Auerbach served as professor of Romance philology at Marburg University (1929-35), taught at the Turkish State University in Istanbul (1936-47), and became professor of French and Romance philology at Yale University in 1950. He published several books and many papers on Dante, Medieval Latin literature, methods of historical criticism, and the influence of Christian symbolism on literature. He is best known for Mimesis , a volume on literary criticism written in Turkey, first published in Berne, Switzerland in 1946, and subsequently widely translated.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
22 (53%)
4 stars
11 (26%)
3 stars
7 (17%)
2 stars
1 (2%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for La Tammina.
90 reviews21 followers
March 22, 2019
Pag. 19 "L'affermazione, che oggi spesso si avanza, secondo cui l'opera andrebbe considerata indipendentemente dall'autore, è giustificata solo in quanto molto spesso un'opera ci dà del suo creatore un'immagine meglio integrata, più vera, di quella che risulta dalle informazioni forse casuali ed equivoche che possediamo della sua vita. Per collocare nel giusto rapporto la vita e l'opera occorre personale esperienza, discrezione e una ampiezza di vedute ricavata da una conoscenza molto precisa del materiale. Ma in ogni caso ciò che noi in un'opera comprendiamo e amiamo è l'esistenza di un uomo, una possibilità di noi stessi."

Pag. 60 "Ma la massima artisticità può benissimo servire alla più autentica e profonda interiorità; e la semplicità popolare non protegge contro la vacuità del cuore."
Profile Image for Ekaitz Ruiz De Vergara.
21 reviews40 followers
September 18, 2021
Seguramente la mayor virtud de Auerbach consista en su capacidad para hacer caracterizaciones muy amplias de grandes épocas literarias sin caer en ningún momento, como ocurre con tantos otros autores, en imprecisas vaguedades ni en rapsodias de "características generales". A ello contribuye su personal método de análisis, que parte siempre de la consideración estilística de un fragmento de una obra concreta, tomada como indicio de algún aspecto más genérico que es explorado a través del pasaje seleccionado. Esta particular adaptación del "círculo filológico" permite iluminar el discurrir de la historia literaria mediante el hilo conductor del estilo literario y su evolución. Así, un pasaje de San Agustín le sirve para trazar la transformación del "sermo sublimis" de época clásica al "sermo humilis" de los autores cristianos de la baja latinidad, con una investigación sobre la idea de pasión desde los griegos a la lírica romance como corolario; una serie de pasajes de Cesáreo de Arles, Gregorio Magno, Gregorio de Tours, Eginardo y otros ilustran las transformaciones de este "sermo humilis" a lo largo de la alta Edad Media; la comparación de un pasaje de la Eneida y su correspondiente en el Roman d'Enéas culmina con el análisis del restablecimiento de la "suprema constructio" en la lírica stilnovista y en Dante. Un apretado y erudito trabajo sobre la constitución y desarrollo del público literario en la Antigüedad y a lo largo de la Edad Media, que adelanta en una década a la estética de la recepción, contextualiza desde el punto de vista histórico y social las transformaciones descritas del estilo literario. Es, hasta la fecha, el mejor estudio sobre literatura medieval que he podido leer.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.