Incredibly disappointing
I would like to start this review by stating two different things. One, I don’t read books based on whether I like the message or not, or whether I agree with the message or not. As a priest, I read a great many things and I both agree and disagree with, to keep an open mind, and to broaden my own horizons. What I look for is whether a book is well-written, presents a cogent viewpoint, argues a compelling case, etc. Two, I was looking forward to this book, especially after the glowing review of Brian Zahnd, several of whose works I have read and thoroughly enjoyed.
The basic problem I have with this book is that it is nothing but opinion. We are told over and over and over that the faith is bigger than the Bible, to turn to Jesus, that we don’t need religion, that we don’t need teachers, that we can be led by the Spirit, etc. Yet, it is convenient that being “led by the spirit” seems to magically turn out to be the viewpoints of progressive Christianity. No real substance or argumentation is given to show why progressive Christianity is more or less correct then fundamentalism, or standard Christian orthodoxy. Instead, we are simply told to trust the guiding of the Spirit. But what is the spirit tells me something different than what it told Keith Giles? Which of us is correct, and how would you even know where proof which was correct, or if both were wrong?
I have argued for a long time that there are only two possibilities, at least logical possibilities, within Christianity. One is that we have an institutional church going back to the very beginning that truly has authority as the body of Christ both to determine what should be considered the word of God in written form and how to interpret said written word of God. The second option is that we simply don’t know for sure what church or churches are more or less correct, and we are left with relativism and individualism, we all do the best we can with the information, training, and intellect that we have.
In this book, Keith Giles have done what Protestants especially are prone to do. He writes a book that complains about the issues of authority, even while he set some stuff up as an authority. He said that the Bible can’t be trusted in many ways because it feels contradictions, but he seems to magically know which parts can be trusted and are true. He says we have to be guided by the spirit, and he magically knows what interpretations are or are not Holy Spirit guided ones. In other words, he is his own personal pope.
He also employs Internet – level argumentation that even a simple google search can answer. For example, he finds a contradiction in Jehu being told to kill the king of Israel (2 Kings 9:7-8), something he is later judged for and even punished for (Hosea 1:4). Clear contradiction, says Giles. Except that we are told exactly why Jehu is judge in 2 Kings 10:29-31--he, like Ahab, like every king of the Northern Kingdom, followed in the sins of Jeroboam. In fact, twice in this same passage we are stated that Jehu proved to be exactly like the man that he killed. There is therefore no contradiction, I just had to be familiar enough with both the Bible and google to check and verify that this claim was off.
He attempts to deal with huge social issues, from the role of women in church to the acceptability of LGBTQ issues in a few pages, again with Internet-level, sloppy argumentation. His claims about Paul speaking to a single woman in Ephesus instead of women in general, for example, is based on conjecture and theorizing, and, considering Paul is talking to women plural, completely implausible. For the sake of transparency, my denomination ordains women, something I wholeheartedly support. It isn't that I am disagreeing with his message because I don't like it, I don't like the book because in many areas I agree and want to like the book, but it is so poorly written and argued that I cannot.
In conclusion, I like to think that I am the target audience for a book like this. I love Brian Zahnd, I love Brad Jersak, I have read every Richard Rohr book there is, have read and reread George MacDonald, CS Lews, etc. And I tend to rate books high, the lowest score I've ever given to a book, prior to this one, being 4 stars. But this book is bad. Not the message. Not the ideas. But the presentation, the arguementation, it is shallow, messy, and, worst of all in my opinion, completely self-contradictory, as, if I take his message seriously, I have no reason to trust him--the Spirit told me differently, after all.