It starts with a school shooting. The mass murderer, as always, was a boy. Michael Black has a boy too -luckily, he was in a different school although in the same city when the shooting happened. Why is it always boys engaging in such senseless violence? Such event triggered him indeed to reflect upon masculinity, manhood, and how we raise our sons in a culture still carrying within itself the heritage of the patriarchal model (it’s about the USA, but many points will resonate with how we perceive traditional manhood across the whole Western world…), reflections that he, here, offers to his son, himself on its way to become a man. And here’s the multi-million pounds question: is masculinity ‘toxic’?
We live a time of reckoning, especially following the #MeToo campaign whereas how men think, approach, treat, and overall behave around women brought to the fore how inappropriate (to say the least…) some of the attitudes and thinking rooted in traditional manhood are. Writing to his teenage son about to go to College, Michael Black therefore takes the more than welcome opportunity to provide insight to boys as to what constitute consent and respecting women’s boundaries (no guys, women are not ‘a mystery’; they’re actually pretty simple to understand, and it all boils down to respect and decency… duh!). Traditional manhood, then, surely contains its fair share of ‘toxic’ behaviours that we all have to face. Does it mean, though, that masculinity itself is ‘toxic’?
He doesn’t think so. He argues, on the contrary, that the traits we’ve been traditionally associating with manhood (strength, courage, independence, discipline) ought to be encouraged, for they’re the seed to a strong and positive character. It’s a fair point, but, personally, I think it’s (a tat) missing the mark. Indeed, I personally think that, first and foremost, such traits are no longer considered specifically ‘masculine’ (they never were; socialisation and the patriarchal model had boxed us all into such narrow labels – something he doesn’t deny, to be fair- and women are no less aggressive or violent than men are empathetic and nurturing). Then, because the issue is not such traits per se but how they are interpreted, and, so, how they translate into our behaviours. He, himself, acknowledges just that, by debunking a few assumptions surrounding what a man should be -you can be vulnerable without being weak; strength is about resilience more than it should be about violence and aggression; and independence shouldn’t mean staunch individualism negating others. I agree on all points.
So, upon closing such welcome reflections, what is it all about?
All in all, it’s a book about love. It’s about the love of a dad for his son, and an affirmation that men can be loved too for being men -we’re not all potential rapists and murderers finding meaning and identity in violence! We’re more than that, and we deserve to be perceived as more than that. Amen! There’s surely something terribly wrong with the way we still socialise men, but it belongs to us all to change that for the better. Everything starts at home, after all.