The first fifteen pages of this book reads like a biography with “Little Boy” a transparent disguise for Ferlinghetti, born in 1919. It gives details of his family and early childhood, through World War II where he took part in the Normandy landings and continues to the late 40’s. Then as “Grown Boy” he “came into his own voice and let loose his wordhoard pent up within him.”
This “wordhoard” does indeed let loose for the rest of this 192 page book. It’s a free-flowing stream-of-consciousness rambling that includes most everything – life, death, sex, friends, writers he’s known and read, politics, religion, the world’s fate, whatever is on Ferlinghetti’s mind. For readers who like their intake more organized, it Ferlinghetti will test their patience, but once you get past the need for an “organized” narrative, it’s not a probem. A big reason for that, I thought, is Ferlinghetti’s imaginative use of metaphorical language. He wirtes of his efforts:
“. . . would he just sing it out to the great unknown or might Little Boy be like a match struck across a night sky lighting up the universe with his laughter and genius, or he cold be just an echo chamber on echo of everything that was ever writ or said or sung still hanging in the eternal dialogue of philosophers fools and lovers and losers the tongue of the soul soumding through time. . .”
Whitman is obviously an influence on Ferlinghetti and he explains further what he is trying to do, to give his reader a great burst of consciousness, a vision of everything all at once (or at least as much in the medium of reading , given that it’s a linear sequential physical process.
". . .And this ain't no novel but a kind of extended epiphany to pin down extempore thinking like a butterfly pinned on a board a hoard a treasure trove of words spread out like wings aflutter in the eternal breeze, the sneeze of time, the wind of consciousness filling the sail and spinnaker ballooning and there is no plot as there is none in life there is only the stutter of wording between waking and sleeping, the little cicada of consciousness singing. . ."
One constant in his vision is death and what he calls the “fourth person singular", a slant on reality which transcends the individual’s “I”, “you”, or “he, she, and it”, our usual points of view. Death mocks us, reduces us to nothingness, but at the same time it always yields t o new birth, as seen in nature and its seasons. Ferlinghetti reminds me of Whitman who wrote, “Look for me under your feet”, emphasizing the impossibility of containing our brief lives. Of death, Ferlinghetti writes:
". . . look into the abyss and hear in death the lyric voice of the fourth person singular the voice of the lyric escape in which spring every year . . .wildflowers spring up in a wave across the landscape at the same speed silently sending the crocus calls for us passing in cars trans or buses at a much faster speed in the wrong direction we zoom across the land enclosed in painted metal cans or fly through the air in winged metal tubes totally disconnected from nature . . ."
In the end, Ferlinghetti is not optimistic about the fate of the world which may well self-destruct because of humanity’s stupidity and greed. The last words in the book speak of the cries of birds which “are not cries of ecstasy, but cries of despair.” . A paradox is possible, though. Not all is despair, otherwise Ferlinghetti would never have written the book in an act of what he calls "eternal creation." It could be considered a sign of faith from a 99 year old.