What do you think?
Rate this book


384 pages, Hardcover
Published August 1, 2018
Book by Brett Kind which is a highly acclamated best-seller author who works on fintech. The autor co-funded the online/new-tech bank Moven, a bank which would benefit if all the speculations done in the book will happen.
I abandoned this book after reading one chapter (the one on blockchains) and the Preface. In the following I state my own reasons.
## Blockchains
As a researcher in the field, I can say that many of the author's speculations are misplaced. To be honest, the author himself assumes that many of his predictions will be wrong.
I read this section first, because that is what I know already, so I used it to understand the whole tone of the book, how he would handle speculation and if he would write hyped statements. So I am assuming he behaves in same way also on topics I am not knowledgeable about.
My impressions are ("he" means "the author"):
+ he has some technical knowledge on the matter
+ he understands tech/academic papers
+ well connected to people working in the field
+ so probably he does the same for all the other topics
+ he does not say things which are blatantly false
+ still he exagerates
+ he tends to advertise Moven
+ also done in the "About The Author" page
+ he presents things as the only way forward
+ he insists on the same concept for too long
+ it is not dense with information
+ he doesn't talks about risks
+ he is a technophile
+ "everything will be better" attitude
+ there is no impartiality
+ therefore it is not the whole story
+ not a starting point for researching the topic
+ also he can not be used as a reference
## Preface
After reading the blockchain chapter I started reading from the beginning. After reading the preface I decided to leave the book for good:
+ the book is part of a saga: Bank 2.0, 3.0, 4.0
+ according to him, he only made correct predictions
+ there is no intellectual 'honesty'
+ probably too much ego
## Conclusion
Having had a taste of the author's style and personality, I decided to abandon the book. In fact the book is quite long and it didn't give me the idea of being full of information. Furthermore, the author has not shown that he is impartial either at the beginning or at the end of the book.