‘महाभारत’ युद्ध-कथा मात्र नहीं है | वस्तुतः यह व्यक्ति तथा समाज के विकास की यात्रा-गाथा है | युद्ध उसके मध्य में है | युद्ध से पूर्व वे कारण और परिस्थितियों है जो युद्ध तक ले जाती है, और युद्ध के पश्चात वे परिस्थितियों तथा मनोविज्ञान हैं जिससे मनुष्य यूद्धक मनःस्थिति से ऊपर उठने तथा शाश्वत सुख और शांति को प्राप्त करने की यात्रा आरम्भ करता है |महाभारत की कथा के विभिन्न खण्डों में विभिन्न चरित्र घटनाओं के अनुसार महत्वपूर्ण होकर उस खण्ड के नायक प्रतीत हिने लगते हैं, किन्तु सम्पूर्ण कथा का नायक धर्मराज युधिष्ठिर ही है | उसके परिवेश का निर्माण उस दिन से आरम्भ होता है जिस दिन भीष्म अपने पिता शान्तनु के दुसरे विवाह के लिए मार्ग प्रशस्त करने हेतु दो प्रतिज्ञाएं करते हैं | ‘बन्धन’ शान्तनु,सत
Padmashree Narendra Kohli is one of the most eminent and well-known Hindi writers of our times. His novel based on the Ram-Katha, Abhyuday, shifted the course of Hindi novel-writing. Another of his novels, Mahasamar, based on the Pandava-katha went on to become just as popular. His novel-series, Todo Kara Todo is considered the greatest and foremost novel in any language on the life of Swami Vivekananda. Abhigyan, Vasudev, Sharnam, Aatmaswikriti, Varunaputri, Sagar-Manthan, Ahalya etc. are his other well-known works. Apart from the Padmashree, he has also been awarded the Hindi Akademi award; Delhi Salaka Samman; Uttar Pradesh Hindi Sansthaan award; Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay Samman, Lucknow; K.K. Birla Foundation award; Vyasa Samman, New Delhi; Madhya Pradesh government and Bhopal’s Maithili Sharan Gupt Rashtriya Samman, among numerous other honours.
डॉ॰ नरेन्द्र कोहली (जन्म ६ जनवरी १९४०, निधन १७ अप्रैल २०२१, चैत्र शुक्ल पंचमी, नवरात्रि) प्रसिद्ध हिन्दी साहित्यकार हैं। उन्होंने साहित्य के सभी प्रमुख विधाओं (यथा उपन्यास, व्यंग्य, नाटक, कहानी) एवं गौण विधाओं (यथा संस्मरण, निबंध, पत्र आदि) और आलोचनात्मक साहित्य में अपनी लेखनी चलाई है। उन्होंने शताधिक श्रेष्ठ ग्रंथों का सृजन किया है। हिन्दी साहित्य में 'महाकाव्यात्मक उपन्यास' की विधा को प्रारंभ करने का श्रेय नरेंद्र कोहली को ही जाता है। पौराणिक एवं ऐतिहासिक चरित्रों की गुत्थियों को सुलझाते हुए उनके माध्यम से आधुनिक सामाज की समस्याओं एवं उनके समाधान को समाज के समक्ष प्रस्तुत करना कोहली की अन्यतम विशेषता है। कोहलीजी सांस्कृतिक राष्ट्रवादी साहित्यकार हैं, जिन्होंने अपनी रचनाओं के माध्यम से भारतीय जीवन-शैली एवं दर्शन का सम्यक् परिचय करवाया है। जनवरी, २०१७ में उन्हें पद्मश्री से सम्मानित किया गया।
नरेंद्र कोहली जी द्वारा 9 भाग में लिखी गई 'महाभारत कथा' का प्रथम भाग है -- बंधन।
शुरुआत होती है महाराज शांतनु की सत्यवती को पाने की असह्य काम-पीड़ा से और अंत होता है पितामही सत्यवती की भलाई के लिए, उनकी इच्छा के विरुद्ध, उनके कानीन पुत्र (विवाहपूर्व प्रेम सम्बन्ध से उत्पन्न पुत्र) वेद व्यास द्वारा उन्हें राजभवन से निकाल कर अपने आश्रम ले जाने की घटना से। इस बीच पाण्डु मर चुके हैं; पांचो पांडव बालक माता कुंती के साथ राजभवन लौट चुके हैं।
महाभारत की कहानी से कमोबेश सभी परिचित हैं लेकिन नरेंद्र कोहली साहब की विशेषता है कि वे पात्रों की आत्मा में प्रवेश कर उनका हर पहलू आपके सामने खोल कर ले आते हैं। और दूसरी विशेषता -- वे पात्रों और घटनाओं को इसी दुनिया से सम्बंधित मान कर लिखते हैं, कुछ भी अकल्पनीय/अविश्वसनीय या परालौकिक नहीं लगता है।
इस पुस्तक में पितृसत्ता, मातृसत्ता, बहुपत्नी, बहुपति, दहेज़ प्रथा और इसके विपरीत धन लेकर कन्या देने जैसी सामजिक नियमों, विवाह पूर्व के प्रेम सम्बन्ध से उत्पन्न संतान की सामाजिक स्थिति और पति की मृत्यु या अक्षमता की स्थिति में संतान प्राप्ति के उद्देश्य से नियम सम्मत ढंग से दूसरे पुरुष की सहायता लेने जैसे टॉपिक्स और इनके क्रमिक विकास और बदलाव को भी कहानी में आत्मसात किया गया है। पाण्डु के लिए कुंती दहेज़ लाई थी जबकि माद्री के लिए धन देना पड़ा था। इस विषय पर भीष्म और माद्री के भाई के बीच हुआ वार्तालाप काफी रोचक है। अंततः निष्कर्ष भी बिलकुल सही निकाला गया कि कोई प्रथा पूर्ण रूप से सही नहीं होती और ये समाज के हित में ही होता है ताकि वक्त और जरुरत के हिसाब से प्रथाएँ नई रूप लेती रहें।
पुस्तक शुरू करने से पहले जिज्ञासा हुई कि इसका शीर्षक "बंधन" क्यों रखा गया होगा ! पढ़ते हुए, और समाप्त कर लेने के बाद लगा कि इससे सार्थक शीर्षक और कुछ नहीं हो सकता था। शीर्षक की सार्थकता इन दो उदहारण से समझी जा सकती है :-
स्वार्थी सत्यवती सोचती है -- "केवट बुद्धि तो इसमें है सत्यवती! कि भीष्म बंसी में फंसा हो और बंसी तेरे हाथ में हो। जैसे-जैसे तू घुमाये, वैसे-वैसे वह घूमे। न तुझे निगल सके, और न तुझे छोड़ कर जा सके। दास बन कर रहे आयु-भर..."
और दूसरी तरफ भीष्म की मनःस्थिति---
"भीष्म मन-ही-मन हँस पड़े...क्या सोचता है मनुष्य, और क्या होता है...वह गृहस्थी के जंजाल में नहीं पड़ना चाहते थे...और प्रकृति ने कितनी बड़ी गृहस्थी उनके चारों ओर जुटा दी है--- माता सत्यवती, अम्बिका, अम्बालिका, मर्यादा, धृतराष्ट्र, पाण्डु, विदुर, कृप, कृपी... जब इतना बड़ा कुटुम्ब है, तो उसके लिए धन-संपत्ति, दास-दासियाँ, आचार्य-सैनिक, गोशाला, अश्वशाला...सब कुछ तो चाहिए...."
I could have written this review in Hindi but maybe I would prefer to have more people read About it than not even knowing that it exists.
Bandhan is the first of nine parts of this magnum opus based on Mahabharata and reminds the reader of why it is called ‘Epic’ in first place. Not merely because it is such a lengthy text but also because it is ‘Epic’ in terms of life-lessons and layers within it’s characters. It is the text that will give complex to even best of the writers and will make them doubt their own talent, if at all.
This part starts with a besotted Shantanu and ends with the return of fatherless Pandavas with Kunti. In between lies the story of blind ambition and senseless promises. There are instances when the reader will fall out of pity for certain characters but behold as it may just be your tenacity’s test. You need to read through to understand the complexities of relationships and ways of the world, then.
For someone who has read many other versions of this grand story, this is definitely going to be a magnificent ride and I hope to finish all parts within this year.
Read for the love of Hindi. Read for the love of brilliance that Mr Kohli is and read for the psychological chasm that this book will take you through. Bring on the next part.
Its one of the best book of Hindi language. Its Indian answer to War and Peace. With vastness of mahabharat at hand Narendra Kohli is at his best. Every character gets its own space in book. Every character is created with its own unique voice. Sometimes some positive character seem similar having similar philosophy yet it is one of the best interpretation of Mahabharat. You just fall in love with the characters once again yet knowing the story. Novel is bit on philosophical side yet its not preachy or boring, it has its own pace. Every incident of Mahabharat has been told in beautiful way without miracles in a logical way. Best thing about the story is it doesn't feel like prehistoric take but feels more contemporary, as same generational gaps still exists and very similar situations are going in the country and we are in need of Krishna Vasudev and Pandavas.
First in the nine book magnum opus written by Nerendra Kohli, 'Bandhan' is the book which Ved Vyas himself would be proud of. From start to finish there is not a single dull moment in the book which force you to put the book down. Flow, storytelling, pace, clarity in conveying thoughts and tale and everything else is so perfect that I felt that Kohliji must have written this book in one sitting and I also wished that I had that much patience to read this book in one sitting. But not having that much patience it took me eight days to end this book.
This book is unlike any other book I have ever read on the Mahabharat. It's not a simple reasonable retelling of events of the epic and it is also not told from a single point of view. The book, and now I hope the whole series, is a fascinating in-depth evaluation of each and every character involved in the first part of the book. Also the book tells the story from different point of views and it's fascinating to read that how a situation is perceived differently by different people and the book delves so deep in the psyche of the characters involved that it not only focuses on different point of views but also the reasons behind those point of views, the reason behind the characters being what they are and why they are so, how the environment they live in shape them. While doing so Kohliji very subtly but equally impactfully draws the power of individual thoughts and how these thoughts transcend into the decision one makes and later how that decision- and point to be noted here- that every single decision effects a big scenerio and holds the power to change not only scenerio but also the future itself. These nuanced undercurrents also include the evergreen debate of nature versus nurture and to my big surprise - the importance of education.
Bhishma's oath would not have been as spontaneous as it is commonly perceived, I have read many retellings of te Mahabharat and in all of them the oath of Bhishm is celebrated and Bhishm is revered for taking this oath. But none of them expolores reasons and the psychological upheaval going on in Bhishm's mind when he took the oath and the hardships and hurdles he faced in maintaining his oath of celibacy. The book captures all these things perfectly and makes Bhishm a multi dimensional and very layered character. But being the book written by Kohliji it not only covers oath from Bhishm's side but it also captures the other side of the oath, it deals with the lives which are effected by the oath and the eventual destruction of those lives. Call it effect of the TV serial Mahabharat, I have always imagined Bhishm in the pure white clothes but the way Kohliji has dealt with the character and etched out both negative and positive aspects of the decisions Bhishm took, that image with pure white clothes has some dust on them.
In S.L. Bhyrappa's 'Parv' I have read something very unusual in a book based on Mahabharat, that thing was the the difficulties faced by Draupadi while dealing with five husbands. That complete part of the book was really very disturbing. In similar way Kohliji has dedicated a very large amount of book to the unsatisfied women of the Kuru family. Similar to Bhyrappaji's Draupadi, here first Amba, Ambika and Ambalika suffers because of the rules of the patriarchal society and an oath taken by a man they have never known. The part of the book which covers the parts of Ambika and Ambalika performing Niyog to bear children is very very disturbing and that part exposes the "nobility" of the "noble clan". The book never treats Amba and Ambalika as minor characters but the voices given to them by Kohliji gives them proper space and time to shine as two of the strongest characters in the book.
One other thing I loved in the book are the debates various characters have about different topics in the book all of them are brilliant and this is the aspect which makes the book an unbiased book. But two of my most favourite debates are the debate between Madra's King Shalya and Bhishm about what is better - taking money in exchange of girl (as a bride) or giving dowry at the time of marriage. Here in this scene Kohliji masterfully finds space and subtly comments on a dying matriarchal culture and a rising patriarchal culture. If you know about the Mahabharat, you know that there was a battle took place between Parshuram and Bhishm and to be honest I was expecting a great action sequence in the book when that battle takes place but what Kohliji has done here is way better than writing a literal battle between the teacher and the disciple. He made that battle a psychological warfare between Satyawati and Amba where the victor will claim over Bhishm and will ultimately fulfil their desires. It is one of the greatest sequence I have ever read in a novel.
There are clear hints in the book that the 'Mahasamar' is going to be an epic series. An epic about some ordinary people trying hard to rebel against their destinies and wanting to carve history with manifestation of their ambitions and desires. This is what makes me more excited about the further books in the series.
Waiting for lockdown to end in my city to read the next part of this magnum opus.
Most of us who know about Mahabharat, perceive it as a book of war. I was one of them until I read Bandhan. This has changed my perception of Mahabharat, the story’s description as not a book of war but as another book about humans. The twisted tale of fate and a desire to control time, Mahabharat never gets old and gets told beautifully here. The way Author walks you through the change of time, different personalities of Hastinapur and shows how slowly the reasoning changes; is remarkable. Nowhere does the Author makes his judgement and adds their narrative or change the story. It is for also the first time that I could read about Ambika and Ambalika who are not talked so often in Mahabharat. Narendra Kohli is such a marvellous writer and his command over Hindi language is beautiful. Last year I read a mere 150 page book in Hindi and that was a test for my Hindi reading ability but this 500+ page novel made has me super proud of myself. Bandhan takes into account innumerable thoughts and asks so many questions which pauses you so much in your thinking that I couldn’t read another book while reading this.
Spoiler free review: Narendra Kohli's books belong to that class which captures the mind of the reader and you're left wondering about the characters and the plot every now and then (even when you're off reading ) through the course of time when reading them. It is unfortunate that these books are not yet translated and thus unfamiliar to the international audience. This might seem like an overstatement but the style of the author's narration certainly surpasses those of popular fantasy fiction writers(say for instance Suzanne Collins or JRR Tolkien) of the west. The element of fantasy and divine magic (seeing as this is a retelling of a religious epic) is largely avoided. Another thing I might add is that the vocabulary of this book is largely sanskritic (loads of tatsam words) which makes reading this book unlikely for the average indian youth who has, (hideously so) an extremely poor knowledge of their mother tongue(hindi, in this instance) when compared to English. The author has also refrained from adding his own speculative bits of story to the original mahabharata but has skipped minor insignificant stories every now and then. Thus making this book an authentic read of the great epic unlike Shashi Tharoor's condescending and parodied version which made me nauseous to be honest. All in all this series is a very great read and worthy of every month or so which you spend in reading all of it.
Bandhan- Mahasamar-1 by Narendra Kohli- is the great epic Mahabharata in modern context. The book is in nine parts. Bandhan narrates the story of Bhishma, his mother Ganga, father Shantanu, king of Puru Vansh, Satyavati alias Matsyagandha, her son from earlier marriage Ved Vyas, father of Satyavati, ministers, people of Puru kingdom and neighboring kings. All characters are normal humanbeings and not like Gods. During that period, son was considered to be property of his father, so after Ganga left Shantanu without giving any explanation, in order of get out of loneliness got charmed to Satyawati alias Matsyagandha. Now her father agreed to marry his daughter on the condition that their child will become the king in place of his elder son Bhishma. Father knows is in a dilemma which the son realisies and take a vow that he will never marry and serve the Puru King. Character building and reasons why a character performed a particular action have been put forth. Book is written in questioning style. The Book is original and the basic theme is of Mahabharata. I read the original publication which was quite cheap and the cost was within the paying capacity of the ordinary reader. The present book is fairly costly. Still, as the book is about Indian culture, it should be translated in various Indian and foreign languages so that the ethos of Indian culture spreads round the world.
Bandhan : Mahasamar-1 by Narendra Kohli (Hindi) is the first part of Mahabharta in which story of Bhishma and his father Shantanu, mother Ganga, Matsygandha, Prince, son, ministers, public, life and times of Puru Vansh has been depitcted. Mahabhara an Indian epic has been written in modern context- each person can relate to incidents of his life and get charmed by the solutions the characters pursued. The story of Mahabharata is known to all. In this book the situation faced by ad duties of a King, son, Prince, Minsters, father of to be queeen, first husband and children of the to be queen have been answered. The language is book is a bit difficult because more literary words are used to enliven the condition of Mahabharata era. After continuing reading, the terms used appear to be simple and their meaning is clear. Readers must not dishearten at this stage and continur reading. About the originality of the Book, the author has stated that a new pipal tree growing from the seed is a new pipal tree. Thus, the story of Mahabharata re-rold in present day context is original book. The book shoould be translated in other languages so that the rich herirage of Indian culture and literature is available to International readers so that they can reserach beyond European, British and American subjects. All volumes of the book are a must read for all.
Excellent, Excellent and Excellent read !!!! Timeless gem in the world of Hindi literature! Thanks to the Author for giving such a magnificent description of thought cycles of characters in Mahabharat. This book shows the great epic through a modern world's prism, giving out different perspectives and tons of questions to ponder. The best thing is that One can easily relate them with the current world's situation.
Very nice book,gives reader a different and interesting perspective of Mahabharata.This books gives a new angle of relationship between Satyawati,ShantanuBheeshm and other characters.Readers get a new mahabharat that is "inner mahasamar"which is going inside each character
मैं एक तरफ शिवजी सावंत की मृत्युंजय पढ़ रहा था तो दूसरी तरफ महासमर भी पढ़ रहा था। कई बार पढ़ते समय दोनों कहानियाँ उलझ जाती थी और ऐसा लगता था कि अभी तो दूसरी बात थी कहानी कैसे बदल गयी फिर याद आता था कि एक साथ एक ही कहानी के दो महान पुस्तको को पढ़ने के कारण ऐसा हो रहा है। महाभारत पर मेरे द्वारा अभी तक पढ़े गए अद्भुत किताबों में तीन किताबें है, महासमर, मृत्युंजय, और पर्व। नरेंद्र कोहली, शिवजी सावंत और एस एल भैरप्पा ने एक ही कहानी पर अलग अलग मास्टरपीस रचा है।
साहित्य के बारे में निर्मल वर्मा लिखते है कि यह प्यास को कम करने कब बजाए बढ़ाता है।इस किताब को पढ़ने के बाद भी प्यास बढ़ जाती है। जिस तरह बुद्ध पर लिखी गयी किताबें हर बार मेरे सामने एक रहस्यमयी और जादुई प्रभाव छोड़ जाती है उसी प्रकार महाभारत पर लिखी गई इन तीनो किताबों में एक अलग प्रकार का नशा है जो धीमें धीमें आपको अपने आगोश में ले लेता है। मुझे हमेशा से लगता रहा कि जिस कहानी के बारे में आप सब कुछ जानते है, हजारों बार जिसे देखा, सुना और पढ़ा है वो कैसे रोचकता के मापदंड पर आपको बांधे रख पाएगी किन्तु हर बार अद्भत किताबों ने मुझे परास्त किया है। महाभरत इतनी महान रचना है कि इसके हर किरदार या घटना को लेकर अलग से ग्रंथो की रचना की जा सकती है, की जा चुकी है और आगे भी की जाती रहेगी।
महासमर शुरू होती है देवव्रत जो कि अपने पिता शान्तनु का विवाह सत्यवती से करवाने के लिए प्रतिज्ञा लेते है और देवव्रत से भीष्म बन जाते है। वैसे तो पूरा का पूरा उपन्यास ही मनोभावो पर आधारित है, पर विवाह के प्रश्न पर भीष्म का चिंतन का एक उदाहरण पढ़िए -
और तभी से देवव्रत के मन में परिवार, समाज और संसार को ले कर अनेक प्रश्न उठते रहे हैं।...परिवार क्या है? पति-पत्नी का परस्पर आकर्षण एक-दूसरे को सम्मान और स्वतन्त्रता देने में है या अपने सुख के लिए अन्य प्राणी को अपनी इच्छाओं का दास बना लेने में? यदि दूसरे पक्ष के सुख के लिए स्वयं को खपा देना परिवार का आधार है तो दूसरे पक्ष की कामना ही क्यों होती है? स्त्री-पुरुष विवाह क्यों करते हैं–अपनी रिक्ति को भरने के लिए या दूसरे पक्ष के अभावों को दूर करने के लिए, या परस्पर एक-दूसरे का सहारा बन, अपनी-अपनी अपूर्णता को पूर्णता में बदलने के लिए?...वात्सल्य क्या है? व्यक्ति, सन्तान अपने सुख के लिए चाहता है? क्या सन्तान वह खिलौना नहीं है, जिसे बालक अपने खेलने के लिए माँगता है? बालक को खिलौने का सुख कभी अभीष्ट नहीं हुआ। माता-पिता सन्तान के लिए स्वयं को नहीं तपाते–वे तपते हैं तो अपने अभावों से तपते हैं। खिलौना टूट जाये तो बच्चा इसलिए नहीं रोता कि खिलौने को टूट कर कष्ट हुआ होगा, वह तो इसलिए रोता है कि उसकी सम्पत्ति नष्ट हो गयी है। जिससे खेल कर उसे सुख मिलता था, वह आधार नष्ट हो गया है।...
522 पन्नो में फैले इस उपन्यास में सिर्फ महाभारत की घटनाएं और कहानी ही नहीं है बल्कि समक��लीन प्रश्नों और उनके उत्तर तलाशने के बहुत प्रयत्न किए गए है। आज के दौर में माता पिता और संतान के बीच दूरियां बढ़ गयी है। गाहे बगाहे अच्छे अच्छे घरों के बुजुर्गों को अनाथालय का द्वार देखना पड़ता है। इससे भी खराब उनकी स्थिति है जो साथ में रहते हुए नारकीय स्थिति को भोगते है। ऐसे में मूल प्रश्न उठता है कि मनुष्य संतान को जन्म क्यों देता है -
“किसी को सन्तान की इच्छा होती ही क्यों है–मैं तो यह ही समझ नहीं पाती राजमाता।” अम्बिका धीरे-से बोली, “गर्भ में सन्तान का पोषण, प्रसव, फिर उसका पालन-पोषण, उसकी शिक्षा-दीक्षा...और फिर प्रत्येक क्षण उसके ��िसी अनिष्ट की आशंका...” उसने सत्यवती को देखा, “क्यों चाहते हैं लोग सन्तान? क्या सुख है उसका?”
सबो के मन में इस जीवन से मुक्त होने की, सत्य पर चलने की, कोई नया मार्ग खोजने की इच्छा होती है किंतु जब मनुष्य कोई ठोस कदम उठता है तो उसके परिवार , मित्रजन सब उसे मन करने लगते है। जैसे कि शान्तनु भीष्म के सन्यास पर चिंता करते हुए सोचते है -
" आज उन्हें अनुभव हो रहा था कि मनुष्य का सहज मन प्रकृति ने कुछ ऐसा बनाया है कि त्रिकालसत्य आदर्शों पर स्वयं चलने का तो वह साहस ही नहीं करता, अपने प्रियजनों को उन आदर्शों की ओर बढ़ते देख कर भी कोई प्रसन्न नहीं होता...राम, राज्य को त्याग कर वनवास के लिए चले गये थे। तो दशरथ उनके त्याग से प्रफुल्लित नहीं हुए थे। "
मेरा शुरू से ही यह मानना था कि मनुष्य निरंतर सुख चाहता है और उसी के पीछे भागते हुए जीवन गुजार द्वता है मेरे लिए सुख और शांति में कोई भेद नहीं था। पहली बार सरल शब्दों में जान की सुख और शांति एकदम अलग है।
“आकांक्षा ही सही! क्या दोष है आकांक्षाओं में? आकांक्षा, पाप है क्या?” “नहीं माँ! आकांक्षा पाप नहीं हैः आकांक्षा दुख और सुख का संगम है, अशान्ति का पर्याय है।” व्यास का स्वर गम्भीर था, “आकांक्षा और शान्ति” दोनों की कामना एक साथ नहीं की जा सकती। प्रकृति के नियम इसकी अनुमति नहीं देते।” “तो क्या व्यक्ति आकांक्षा न करे?” “करे। किन्तु तब न सुख से डरे, न दुख से। शान्ति की कामना न करे। शान्ति न सुख में है, न दुख में। शान्ति तो इन दोनों से निरपेक्ष होने में है।”
सुख, दुख, भोग, शांति, अशांति, जीवन, लक्ष्य, सन्यास, कर्म, पाप, पुण्य आदि शाश्वत प्रश्नों का उत्तर खोजती यह1 महागाथा एक दुर्लभ कृति है। अद्भुत चिंतन, मनन, अन्तर्दृष्टियाँ, अंतर्विरोधों और आदर्शों से भरी यह एक गहन चिंतन करने योग्य कृति है।
अंत में पुस्तक के कुछ अंश -
‘नियति चाहे डूबना हो, किन्तु नीति तो संघर्ष ही है।’
निराशा को जीवन से निकाला जायेगा, तो उससे जो शून्य बनेगा, वह रिक्त नहीं रहेगा–आशा आ कर उसमें डेरा डालेगी। आशा तभी टिकेगी, जब कुछ अर्जन होगा।…पर अर्जन तो कोई उपलब्धि नहीं है। उसका मन जैसे ठिठक गया…उसके तर्क के पग किस ओर उठ रहे थे?...अर्जन की ओर? भोग की ओर?...पर तर्क रुका नहीं। वह जैसे आज बहुत ही संघर्षशील हो रहा था… अर्जन कोई उपलब्धि नहीं है, पर विसर्जन ही क्या उपलब्धि है? रिक्ति को भरना तो उपलब्धि हो सकती है; किन्तु पूर्ति को रिक्ति में परिवर्तित करना क्या उपलब्धि हुई…और रिक्ति से रिक्त तक जीना भी क्या जीवन हुआ…
उसे लगता था कि उसके अपने भीतर एक बहुत बड़ी गुफा थी–काली और अँधेरी! उसका मन उसी गुफा में भटक रहा था।
“वह एक मद है, जो रक्त को उफ़नाता है। उससे उत्तेजना का अनुभव होता है। वह सुख नहीं है। सुख का भ्रम उससे अवश्य उत्पन्न होता है। उत्तेजना अपने-आप में कष्ट है। उसके अवसान की आशंका भय है।...और उसका अवसान पीड़ा है।”
“बद्धजीव कभी सुखी नहीं हो सकता माँ!” व्यास बोले, “जब तक तुम अपने बन्धनों को पहचानोगी नहीं, उन्हें अपने दुखों का कारण नहीं मानोगी, उन्हें तोड़ने का संकल्प नहीं करोगी...तब तक भीष्म तुम्हें अपने शत्रु दिखायी पड़ेंगे।...और तुम सुखी नहीं हो सकोगी माँ!”
सुख’ और ‘भोग’ दो अलग स्थितियाँ हैं माँ!” द्वैपायन बोले, “‘सुख’ एक मानसिक स्थिति है, जो भोग के अभाव में भी सम्भव है। या शायद अधिक सत्य यही है कि सुख, भोग के अभाव में ही सम्भव है। और भोग तो दुख का प्रवेश-द्वार है माँ! भोग ने कभी किसी को सुखी नहीं किया।”
Extremely good book. Fantastic work on character development of multitude of individuals present in this great epic. Great platform for rest of the books in series.
This is the first part of 8 part series Mahasamar by Narendra Kohli. I had read this book maybe 20 years ago but got the opportunity to read rest of the books recently only. So decided to re-read it to refresh the details so that the reading of the whole series become more meaningful and enjoyable.
In this author starts with the arrival of Satyavati (Matsyagandhi) to Hastinapuram to the point Vyasa ask his mother to go with him for Vanavasa though she is very reluctant to do it. During her time in Hastinapuram she managed to ensure Bhishma will not get married or become king but at the same time kept him on her chain to make him do all the things she wanted including kidnapping wives for her son, finding wives for her grandchildren but never listened to his advice. Only looked for Bhishma when her own plans or ideas made things so bad that she needs Bhishma to salvage it and if possible blame him.
During her stay she managed to witness death of her husband, her children, and her grandson. When her sons died without children she forced her daughter in laws to sleep with the son she had before her marriage. After Shantanu, Hastinapuram is ruled by Satyavati's bloodline and not Bharata dynasty anymore.
This is story of a very greedy woman who wanted to dictate and control everyone in her family to her plans and how it leads the whole family to destruction. Satyavati is the seed which was planted into Hastinapuram and many years later bloomed in full in Kurukshethram war and in the destruction of almost all the family alongwith most of the Kshathriyas of the time.
This book also shows us how the pledge taken by Devavruthan (Bhishma) let all this happen and how Bhishma is the one who could have stopped it from the very beginning but never did the actual step he had to take. When it was time for his own marriage, and when it was time for his father to get his son married, Bhishma decided to get the woman for his father who was suffering from lust. At that time Bhishma thought he is fulfilling his dharma by doing what his father wanted but it was against nature and there started the downfall of the Hastinapuram.
It is just poetic that Vyasa ensured Bhishma lives to witness the destruction of the family in Hastinapuram and it was all due to his misinterpretation of dharma and duties to his father. He failed to realize his duties to bigger society is more important than his duties to his father or family.
I reserve 5-star ratings on Goodreads for books that resonate deeply with me. Narendra Kohli's rendition of the Ramayana profoundly impacted my perspective, not just on the Ramayana but also on life itself. Now, I've embarked upon 'Mahasamar', Kohli's interpretation of the Mahabharata. Undoubtedly, the Mahabharata stands as humanity's magnum opus in literature. Its vast scope and intricate nuances remain unparalleled, and Kohli's treatment does nothing but justice to it.
'Bandhan', the inaugural installment in Kohli's series, delves into the genesis of the Kuru conflict, beginning with King Shantanu's infatuation with Satyavati and concluding with Kunti's return to Hastinapur with the young Pandavas. 'Bandhan', translating to 'bond', epitomizes the entanglements that ensnare individuals, shaping their destinies, actions, and identities.
Kohli's mastery lies in his vivid portrayal of each character within the narrative tapestry. Even peripheral figures in conventional adaptations, such as Ambika and Ambalika, receive nuanced humanization. He adeptly explores the internal conflicts of all, providing depth to their motivations and actions. Readers may find themselves drawn to or repelled by characters, yet Kohli ensures they comprehend the underlying reasons behind their personas. Such narrative finesse is nothing short of brilliance. Two characters who really touched my heart were Bhishma and Madri.
I have always held the opinion that Narendra Kohli should be read by anyone who can read Hindi. The first book of 'Mahasamar' serves as yet another testament to this assertion. However, I would like to mention that it is novelization of Mahabharata, and hence should not be looked as translation of it. There are bound to be deviations from the actual source.
How do you rate an epic? How am I even qualified to rate it? This is the feeling I have when I was submitting the ratings. You dont just read it, you read, introspect and in the process may learn more about life.
महाभारत को अलग अलग दृष्टिकोण से देखना है, समझना है और हर पात्र के मन में झांक कर देखना है तो महासमर पढ़नी होगी, सारे अंक। बहुत विस्तार से महाभारत की कथा लिखी है नरेंद्र कोहली ने, कुछ बातें कल्पना पर भी छोड़ी हैं और बहुत सारी घटनाओं का मानवीकरण, बहुत ही तार्���िक और सार गर्भित तरीके से।
Tells the story of Mahabharata epic from the beginning. Starting from Shantanu's marriage with Satyavati till the birth of pandavas. The narration is amazing especially the part where characters are thinking and are in a state of flux and dilemma. very relevant in today's world
The Great Epic-1 Bondage: The Story of Bhishma (Paperback) by Narendra Kohli- The Book is Mahabharata the great epic Mahabharata in modern context. Part 1- Bandhan narrates the story of Bhishma, his mother Ganga, father Shantanu, king of Puru Vansh, Satyavati alias Matsyagandha, her son from earlier marriage Ved Vyas, father of Satyavati, ministers, people of Puru kingdom and neighboring kings. All characters are normal humanbeings and not like Gods. During that period, son was considered to be property of his father, so after Ganga left Shantanu without giving any explanation, in order of get out of loneliness got charmed to Satyawati alias Matsyagandha. Now her father agreed to marry his daughter on the condition that their child will become the king in place of his elder son Bhishma. Father knows is in a dilemma which the son realisies and take a vow that he will never marry and serve the Puru King. Character building and reasons why a character performed a particular action have been put forth. Book is written in questioning style. The Book is original and the basic theme is of Mahabharata. I read the original publication which was quite cheap and the cost was within the paying capacity of the ordinary reader. The present book is fairly costly. Still, as the book is about Indian culture, it should be translated in various Indian and foreign languages so that the ethos of Indian culture spreads round the world.