Ruth was a high-born Moabite, the widow of an Israelite slain by treachery. So great was her beauty that men stopped in battle to look at her. Boaz was the dynamic general of the Israelite army. Theirs was a love so great that it overcame bitter hatred, war and exile. In a country of strangers, accused of being a spy and pursued by the lust of her enemies, Ruth became, through devotion and courage, the heroine of the Bible's most memorable love story.
Frank Gill Slaughter , pen-name Frank G. Slaughter, pseudonym C.V. Terry, was an American novelist and physician whose books sold more than 60 million copies. His novels drew on his own experience as a doctor and his interest in history and the Bible. Through his novels, he often introduced readers to new findings in medical research and new medical technologies.
Slaughter was born in Washington, D.C., the son of Stephen Lucious Slaughter and Sarah "Sallie" Nicholson Gill. When he was about five years old, his family moved to a farm near Berea, North Carolina, which is west of Oxford, North Carolina. He earned a bachelor's degree from Trinity College (now Duke University) at 17 and went to medical school at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. He began writing fiction in 1935 while a physician at Riverside Hospital in Jacksonville, Florida.
Books by Slaughter include The Purple Quest, Surgeon, U.S.A., Epidemic! , Tomorrow's Miracle and The Scarlet Cord. Slaughter died May 17, 2001 in Jacksonville, Florida.
(I read the Spanish translation--"La Canción de Ruth." Not a great translation, but very readable.)
I enjoyed reading this book, which is why I give it 3 stars. However, it wasn't a very good book, which is why I don't want to score it any higher.
Much of the novel was fun to read, like a romance/action adventure. The characters were pretty good, and although it is a story from the Bible it was not written in a devotional way, so that the bits of religion didn't feel too cloying. However, it had flaws that were impossible to ignore, even reading for fun.
Many of the plot points were not believable, and felt like blind spots in the author's research. It has the kind of flaw that drives me crazy in fiction, relating to errors in scale and size. Sometimes, two points are treated as close, as if they are just a short walk apart, and other times they are days between. Sometimes, the Israelites feel like a community of a couple hundred who all know each other, and then they are treated like a nation of tens of thousands. A related error is the way the author has the characters handling weapons, which he did not write about with much authority. I think he was guessing.
In other words--using a term that might or might not have been current in the 50s when it was written--the author has done a poor job of world-building. Too much was implausible. Honestly, it felt a lot like a 50s-era Hollywood set standing in for the Middle East. That impression is intensified by the fact that Ruth, a Semitic woman of 3000 years ago, has red hair, as if she is played by a European actress. Perhaps I would have enjoyed it better if I had imagined it like a sword and sandal epic, with Tony Curtis as Boaz and Sophia Loren as Ruth. Yeah, that's better.
Or better still, imagine it with William Shatner and some green lady on a red planet. Then I can forgive the cheap Paramount sets. :)
Nice account of the story of Ruth and Naomi. Probably more fiction than fact, but I enjoy historical fiction as it often gives "legs" to the more sparse Biblical accounts, and makes me consider more deeply what life would have been like for the people living at that time. In particular, for Ruth, from the hated Moabite race, joining Israel.
Very well written. I understand that it is not real accurate, but it is a wonderful love story. The heroine is just about a perfect person, which is a little over the top sometimes, but I still enjoyed it.
This was a enjoyable & quick read. It's a story of Ruth & Naomi in the Bible. Obviously the story is fictional, but I'm not sure how accurate it is in regards to the historical background at the time & the cultural expectations. However, it brings to life the characters. It's good in the sense that it makes the story alive in your mind, but it could be bad in the sense that it gives you preconceived notions about the characters in the story. So be sure to separate that in your mind before reading the Bible story again!
Not really the story of Ruth. Not a bad work of fiction, not a great one. A very middling work of fiction with interesting characters, lots of intrigue and a happy ending. Just not the story from the Bible. A quick weekend read.