What do you think?
Rate this book


156 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1994
Last volume, I called Rayek a terrible character with stupid, boring motives. That's less true now, but the central conflict in this arc remains frustratingly stupid. Rayek wants to time travel and prevent the crash of the palace; Cutter's bent on stopping him because if the palace hadn't crashed, the wolfriders and other elves wouldn't exist, so it's good that the palace crashed. There are a few attempts to make Rayek sympathetic, but on the whole, it's clear that the narrative supports its protagonist, Cutter. Rayek's an egomaniacal asshole who does stereotypical villain things like trying to kill people for no good reason and separating people from their families, and he has some kind of alliance with Winnowill, who's also evil. Cutter's a hero who cares about family. Obviously, Cutter's right and Rayek's wrong!
The problem with this (apart from the usual problem that such black & white conflict is lazy writing and not especially interesting) is that Cutter's shitty argument - just a kneejerk reaction, really - can be used to justify practically anything (with exceptions for things like benevolent world explosion). What's the first thing a stereotypical time traveler does? Try to prevent the Holocaust, because that has to be a change for the better, right? Sorry, it's actually a good thing that the Holocaust happened, because we're in a timeline where the Holocaust did in fact happen, which means there are billions of people who currently exist but would not exist had the Holocaust not happened.
That should be enough to make Cutter's extreme stupidity plain to you, but to go a bit further: we don't even need to bring time travel into this. Imagine using this argument in a criminal trial. "Your honor, we may safely assume that my client's actions have by now had butterfly effects on the conception of various children. Therefore, it's actually a good thing that he murdered all those people."
Cutter needs to read Reasons and Persons and write an essay on the depletion thought experiment, at least two pages long.