THE POPULAR COLUMNIST AND AUTHOR EXPRESSES HIS FEELINGS ABOUT THE SCANDAL
Journalist, columnist and author Jimmy Breslin wrote in the Prologue of this 2004 book, "the pope called the American cardinals to Rome over their failure to protect children from priests... Afterward, the cardinals and bishops held two more meetings in America... [and] formed a large national commission to investigate every complaint, pluck out all offending priests, and end the dark night. After some months, the bishops announced that they had determined that over four thousand priests had been accused of molesting ten thousand, mostly young boys, from 1950 until 2002, The head of the bishops conference... proclaimed the scandal 'history.' He can no more prove these figures than I can of my considered estimate of twenty-five thousand priests and one hundred thousand victims in those fifty-two years." (Pg. xii)
He asserts, "The bishops and some Vatican bureaucrats believed that they were beyond the law, that their own religious statutes, called canon law, allowed them to handle all transgressions as church business. This could have let the church glide unnoticed through all storms. Crime by clergy was their business alone. They believed that. They really did. They were going to take their instructions from the centuries. Stall, confer, draw the thickest drapes until the room is dark and then tell you that there is a marvelous sunset outside." (Pg. 17)
He says, "my friend Michael Daly of the Daily News newspaper had told me, 'Jack Maple says kids tell him the [Fr. Bruce] Ritter [founder of Covenant House] is a chicken hawk.' Maple was a transit cop who worked Times Square... The phrase 'chicken hawk' was too disturbing for me to grasp. I let the subject pass by me like paper blowing in the gutter. Or I thought I had. Every time I saw Ritter's name, I had doubt running into suspicion. I better start walking Times Square, I told myself." (Pg. 62)
This book is no "journalistic" summary of the entire scandal, but rather one articulate Catholic's indignant reaction to the controversy. His expressions of outrage will find a number of persons agreeing strongly with him.