What do you think?
Rate this book
Exposing Hate: Prejudice, Hatred, and Violence in Action
Experts have documented an explosive rise in the number of hate groups since the turn of the century, driven by anger over immigration and demographic projections showing that whites will no longer hold majority status in the United States by 2040. The rise accelerated with the elections of presidents Obama and Trump. Extremists are increasingly diffuse, moving to the web and away from organized, on-the-ground activities. What is a hate group and how does it operate? How do we legally define hate speech and hate crimes? What is the history of organizing around hate and how do we recognize and confront it? These are the salient issues readers will investigate in this overview.
- GenresNonfiction
144 pages, Library Binding
Published January 1, 2019
38 people are currently reading
33 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
July 15, 2019
The concept: Teach teen readers about hate, prejudice, and violence in America using discussions of recent (within the last few years) conflicts.
The concept itself is a great one. The problem is that this book then become a bit too simplistic in its discussion of hatred. To preface this review, I'd like to tell you that I think --all-- hate groups suck and that there is no place in the world for them. While this book agrees with that sentiment, it often does a good job of using "they" to lump a lot of different people together. Rather than trying to explore issues that lead individuals to joining hate groups, the first half of the book just makes broad statements about groups. The "alt-right" is lumped together as is the "alt-left" with very little wiggle room (at one point the author says there are extremes in each group, but this is after a lot of simplification). By lumping even hate group members into one resounding "they" this book presents problems in its analysis. Hate is not one-size-fits-all yet a lot of the times this book just uses "they" to lump groups together.
The audience is teens, but I'd suggest the earlier teens because the book tends to over simplify things. There are even words that the book goes on to define (most of which I'd like to think a teen could understand; or think teens know how to use a dictionary).
The position of the book is simple: Hate groups are terrible. While I do agree, the book starts off as if it is going to be unbiased and present two views. It does not, which is fine, but it then shouldn't begin as if it is going to give both sides of the argument.
This book does criticize President Trump -- but I think this again over simplifies hate groups. The book suggests that the rise in hate groups (and their lack of fear to now identify openly as being a hate group) revolves around Trump. The rise in hate groups could be attributed to Trump, but to not discuss or delve into the reasoning behind why there is a rise and just oversimplifying things is a poor methodological standpoint.
My overall opinion of this quick mini-read: It oversimplifies everything and only gives one side of the argument. It may be the correct side of the argument (hate groups do suck and it would be nice if they didn't exist) but the book fails to even explore the other side of the argument. It shouldn't present itself as being unbiased in the beginning, act like it will explore both sides, then not do so. But my biggest grief is the oversimplification of 99% of everything discussed in this book. I truly think teens are smarter than this book must assume them to be.
The concept itself is a great one. The problem is that this book then become a bit too simplistic in its discussion of hatred. To preface this review, I'd like to tell you that I think --all-- hate groups suck and that there is no place in the world for them. While this book agrees with that sentiment, it often does a good job of using "they" to lump a lot of different people together. Rather than trying to explore issues that lead individuals to joining hate groups, the first half of the book just makes broad statements about groups. The "alt-right" is lumped together as is the "alt-left" with very little wiggle room (at one point the author says there are extremes in each group, but this is after a lot of simplification). By lumping even hate group members into one resounding "they" this book presents problems in its analysis. Hate is not one-size-fits-all yet a lot of the times this book just uses "they" to lump groups together.
The audience is teens, but I'd suggest the earlier teens because the book tends to over simplify things. There are even words that the book goes on to define (most of which I'd like to think a teen could understand; or think teens know how to use a dictionary).
The position of the book is simple: Hate groups are terrible. While I do agree, the book starts off as if it is going to be unbiased and present two views. It does not, which is fine, but it then shouldn't begin as if it is going to give both sides of the argument.
This book does criticize President Trump -- but I think this again over simplifies hate groups. The book suggests that the rise in hate groups (and their lack of fear to now identify openly as being a hate group) revolves around Trump. The rise in hate groups could be attributed to Trump, but to not discuss or delve into the reasoning behind why there is a rise and just oversimplifying things is a poor methodological standpoint.
My overall opinion of this quick mini-read: It oversimplifies everything and only gives one side of the argument. It may be the correct side of the argument (hate groups do suck and it would be nice if they didn't exist) but the book fails to even explore the other side of the argument. It shouldn't present itself as being unbiased in the beginning, act like it will explore both sides, then not do so. But my biggest grief is the oversimplification of 99% of everything discussed in this book. I truly think teens are smarter than this book must assume them to be.
January 12, 2020
A brief introduction for teens on a topic that remains relevant as we approach the end of Donald Trump's first term as president. The book is quite short, so it obviously doesn't delve very deeply, but looking at it as a potential addition my middle school's library, I think it offers good definitions to things like hate crimes and hate groups as a way to introduce the concepts to kids so you can then encourage them to do more involved research.
Edited to add: Forgot to mention that I do have a bit of an issue with the book's really small section on the so called "alt left." Miller states that not all extreme groups are from the right wing and then lists antifa as a left wing extremist group, but based on his own writing about them and their activities antifa does not meet the definition of a hate group provided by the book. He goes on to say that some believe that Trump and others like him are only trying to spread the idea of the alt left in order to down play the alt right, so why appear to lend legitimacy to this by including the alt left in the book when it doesn't have the same support for inclusion as the rest of the groups?
Edited to add: Forgot to mention that I do have a bit of an issue with the book's really small section on the so called "alt left." Miller states that not all extreme groups are from the right wing and then lists antifa as a left wing extremist group, but based on his own writing about them and their activities antifa does not meet the definition of a hate group provided by the book. He goes on to say that some believe that Trump and others like him are only trying to spread the idea of the alt left in order to down play the alt right, so why appear to lend legitimacy to this by including the alt left in the book when it doesn't have the same support for inclusion as the rest of the groups?
September 29, 2020
I missed the memo on this being a psa for teenagers, solid, basic flimflam.
April 16, 2021
The book Exposing Hate is a good book story because it has a lot of history of Hate groups, such as the Holocaust. Most of these Hate groups, hate different types of genders such as gays, Bisexual, and Transgender which now of day's it's called LGBT. Holocaust also hated different race like Jews, Blacks, and Latins to name a few. Different types groups that are not related to them. Exposing Hate also gives a lot of history of violence, conflicts, hate, and racism to many groups that were made from back then. It also gives information of how they protested. The Exposing hate is pretty good in my personal opinion, I enjoyed reading the book it also had a lot of historical meaning and that's why i Decided to read this book because it was attracting. I will most certainly recommend this book to other people in the future that are interested in historical group hates and civil right movements.
April 1, 2024
It is a good introduction to a complex phenomenon. It does attempt an unbiased perspective on a political basis. However, it doesn't hide the fact that most hate groups stem from the alt-right. I will argue that it is somewhat inaccurate on its description of Black hate groups concerning their politics, but it does try to be nuanced in general.
June 28, 2021
Good, quick read with a bunch of info on various hate groups, race violence, and background for racial issues.
September 6, 2021
Good content review. Nice glossary at the end. Good explanation of hate speech and free speech.
February 10, 2023
Apart from a few interesting historical nuggets, nothing much of help here. It basically takes a one-sided, simplistic, conventional view of “hatred” without offering much insightful or helpful.
March 20, 2019
Exposing Hate is full of info about the history, rise, and current state of hate and hate groups. However, unless the finished book has more photos and sidebars, it will be a hard book to get through for most teens. It is also very one-sided, not that I agree with extremist groups AT ALL, but the book is definitely not from an impartial POV and the author's feelings are obvious.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews