A guy who might lose his home to the bank wrote a book to promote his other books, and his courses. I doubt the courses are any better.
The text is better than the legendary authors I have read before and who end up with something that resembles hanging up with them. Most probably the legends are just idiots who stumbled into fame with a few good stories, or maybe they are unwilling to share their incredible skill. From this perspective Schmidt is a better choice. But he is going to bull* you as well.
> But in order to tell it in comics, you have to be extremely good at all the obvious things that go with telling stories: character development, crafting character arcs, setting up conflict, plotting and creating highs and lows for your characters.
While character development and character arc are about the same, but purists will argue they are so much different, yea, he can justify wasting more words. But plotting is pretty much about setting up conflict. and creating high and lows for your characters is just part of the character arc.
> What I’ve learned through years of teaching, both as a comics editor (on staff at Marvel Comics and IDW Publishing) and through my Introduction to Writing Comics class at Comics Experience, is another simple truth: While it is true that \[...\]
How amazing he can be! Meh. And such a long introduction for a ”simple” truth. That starts with ”while it is true”.
Is there a switch somewhere? People who can't express themselves write stories for the Comic books? After all this sort of crap is after a few rewrites and a couple of editors going through the text. This guy's scripts should be barely readable, as the text is for the inker and the letterer, and not the general public.
And he is recommending Bendis. Is this because Schmidt himself does not have anything better to add? Or is it the same Marvel phenomenon in which each collaborator reverently kisses the behinds of other Marvel employees?
> This book, based on the online Introduction to Comics Writing class that I created when I founded Comics Experience, is not a true substitute for the course itself.
Oh. So the award winning nobody has to sell courses and books to make next month's rent. Truly a successful career. I can imagine an ”award winning” Brad Pitt asking the audience to buy his action figures and photos on their way out.
Like Bendis, the ”Guide” to ”writing” comics involves a lot of drawn panels, none of them illustrating the given text.
Chapter 1: Story
> The word story brings to mind movies, novels, comics and, sometimes, terrifying tales around a campfire. All stories have common elements, but defining exactly what a story is can be tricky.
That is the opening. Huh?
And than he jumps into what is a writer, and what is a penciler.
Is this guy for real?
Scene. What is a scene?
> Sometimes a scene occurs to me almost completely written, and it will just take over my mind. Usually, a scene sets up a situation and has more than one character in it. This happens to me fairly regularly. My comic book Achilles Inc. \[...\]
What a disgusting person. So far he said nothing about the Story. He jumps over to scene. What is a scene? Empty words. But did you know this a-hole has a book to sell?
Chapter 2: Characters
> Most people don’t really understand the importance of characters to a story. But the truth is that it’s not the concept behind a story or the plot itself that make us want to come back, though those are the two things we tend to jump to when we describe a story we’ve read or seen. It’s the characters. We want to spend time with them again and again.
That is the first paragraph.
And now the reader can make far better characters knowing that most people don't really understand.
And again, this moron speaks truth.
No detail. A picture with some sketches thrown in. And now it's time for
Character and Plot.
The moron has not said anything about the character, but what about character AND plot? The plot was also not referenced before. But who cares?
I turned to the last pages. An amateurish picture of the author, done by someone with the same last name spelling, meaning the dead beat could not afford someone with enough skill NOT to cut the top of his head.