Good sequel to “Inverting the Pyramid”
Of all football journalists, Jonathan Wilson (JW) is the best. He knows his tactics, his history and all the stats. JW has managed to put his football fanaticism to good use, i.e. enlighten the rest of us. Inverting the Pyramid (ITR) is the best football book I’ve ever read, so I figured to give this book a try. I grew up in the 80s/90s and have followed football ever since. The pace of play, athleticism, passing, intelligence and mental hardness have all improved dramatically. If you watch a game from the 70s, you almost fall asleep compared to the spectacle of the average Champions League match. Today it’s like you’re watching a pinball machine. You have lightning fast wingers like Robben and Mbappé, center backs built like MMA fighters, midfielders with the lung capacity of horses and absurdly high passing accuracy, etc., etc. The game today is much more demanding than it was in the past. It’s fair to say that football attracts the best athletic talent in the world, at least in Europe, South America and Africa. The non-UK anglo-world optimises, of course, for other sports.
JW focused himself in ITR on football tactics from 1900 to 2000, this book is much more about football philosophy from the early 70s until today. As footballers became ever better in quality, the spectacle of play often became less. There is no fun to see teams who make ZERO mistakes in defence. These teams might very well win prestigious prizes, but who remembers a clinical effective eam like the 2012 Champions League winning Chelsea? Nobody. OTOH, yet every foorball fan remembers the spectacular Champions League winning Barca of 2011. This has a lot to do with the mentality coaches instill on the players. Barcelona often plays to impress and entertain, Chelsea plays to keep a clean sheet and win. JW focuses on the football legacy of Johan Cruyff, his acolytes (Van Gaal, Guardiola, Koeman, Luis Enrique, Rijkaard), his nemesis (Mourinho) and Ajax, Barcelona, Bayern, Spanish and Dutch national team in general to explain these different views of football. According to JW the prominence and brilliance of the entertaining teams stems from the insights of Cruyff and his successors who improved upon it. The result-oriented coaches like Mourinho believe that the final score is all that matters. (Looking at his resume, he's not wrong!)
I don’t think either of these philosophies is a definite answer. Football is a spectator sport and must entertain, but in the end champions, by definition, must win! The curse of Dutch football has always been that they impress, but lose. (Though, the Dutch national tried to play for results in the FIFA WC final 2010, but still lost. So, it's better to impress after all?) Either way, it’s a fascinating discussion: should football coaches impress audiences or focus on results? The British clubs have gone to the Mourinho side: it doesn't matter who clubs put in that jerseys, how they score or what they do off the pitch -- as long as they win. Even nowadays, big money has taken over Barca, and no club has won more European Championships than Real Madrid, so... we're all galacticos now?
In his heart JW is still a football romantic, like Cruyff, but in the end football players choose money over clubs and therefore the richest clubs will rule the roast. Sometimes, we luck out when Guardiolas manage these clubs and entertain us, but sometimes we get (and need!) Mourinhos to deliver us the cold results.