Cute story, but towards the end on page 109, it says, "Mom gave Amy a look, and Amy stared at the carpet, feeling miserable and guilty. Mrs. Jones had hardly seen her because Amy had been tempting her away. She'd been so stupid! Mom had been right - she had stolen someone else's cat."
Being a 40-something-year-old white woman living in America, I've been doing a lot of reading about guilt & especially shame (thank you, Brene Brown, you are a freaking rock star) & how early the indoctrination begins, so I'm thoroughly disgusted by the above language in this book. First of all, obviously young boys can & do read books about little animals, but this is more likely to be read by a majority of young girls. Why oh why oh freaking WHY are we teaching our young children to feel SHAME & GUILT in a freaking children's book for heaven's sake?? This was not even written that many years ago... They never address her feelings, & they flat out say "she'd been so stupid". WTAF people. This is a sweet story about a kind, compassionate CHILD who had done the right thing by not letting a skinny, scrawny, abandoned-looking kitten starve to death, & we're going to normalize her feeling guilty, miserable, & call her stupid by not addressing it?? DISGUSTING.
My 7-year-old was reading this aloud, & I thought she misspoke, & made her spell the words for me, because I was so taken-aback. Shame on everyone who let this go to print as-is. Our children deserve better.