H. U. von Balthasar argues that merely living the social gospel of Christianity is not enough to distinguish Christians from Humanists. I appreciated his view of Christian humanism versus Secular Humanism. He distinguishes Christian humanism by adding, of course, the faith element (60). A Christian understands the gospels to not be some dated, stagnant writing but an account of how Christ continues to companion a believer now just as he did with the original community of disciples (53-58).
Living a contemplative life of both spiritual and material poverty while maintaining the mission of the Church and exemplifying self-sacrificing Love ala Christ are signs of Christian “maturity” (67-102). To “practice” as a Christian seems to be defined by the transformation of theory to action; “A practical Christian is a man who undergoes this resurrection of truth in the reality of his life. When this happens, the practical Christian becomes a practising Christian…a practising Christian is one who loves Jesus and ‘keeps his commandments’ ” (96). Balthasar highlights attending Mass, confessing, celebrating the Church calendar/feast days, and live as an example of how to accept (as the Didache also says) that all things come from God (98-102).
Balthasar flowers up the above directives, of course, but these are what boils down to “practicing” as a Christian (a Catholic-Christian specifically) before plunging into the last bit of his work in the final chapter. He makes the argument that in being “not of the world,” the Christian works—through their labor, obedience to God, and their values wherever they find themselves—by “building up of the kingdom of humanity” and in so doing, “contributed something small to the kingdom of God in the world and realm of men” (113). Indeed, he writes, “The more earthly civilization organizes itself and undertakes campaigns against poverty, disease, hunger, illiteracy, the more Christians must take part in these schemes as human beings working with other human beings, and help them to progress” (117). In this way, the Church can fulfill its original commission by Christ (not post-Vatican II’s social gospel movement, he is quick to point out) to serve the poor, downtrodden, etc. Through this work and the work of prayer, a Christian becomes “emptied of self” and “in faith and obedience has dispossessed himself” on his path to God (120;123).
I respect the work of von Balthasar and am reading him to seek to understand his theology more deeply. However, I cannot help but think that he is giving us only a long homily in this book. In top of that, he is so long winded! I should have stopped on page 44 when he says, “Who is a Christian?…the man who most deeply ingrains what is Christian into the stuff of the modern world.” That’s it! That’s all, folks! Book over. Done. Alas, it is not. This book was a boring and laborious read.
As a cradle-Catholic, I was disappointed in hearing the same ole’ “go to Mass, don’t miss the Holy Days of Obligation, and wash behind your ears” routine. If you grew up Catholic, you have heard all this before. If you just converted, skip the book and take this review as a summary. As for me, I’ll stick with my Secular Humanism and live like von Balthasar calls Christians to live without all the Mass-going and twisting myself into contortions thinking about how to make sense of this sort of theology anymore.