Viv
People love riddles, the incomplete and the inexplicable are tremendously compelling. I am The Mysterious Lady. The Sawn-in-half Lady, where the past is what has been sawn off.
Narrator
That is no longer the case. The past has been glued back on.
Almost two years ago, I left my job. After 35 years in the IT industry, I wanted to see if I could make a business out of a combination of two long term hobbies: nature and photography. So, it will come as no surprise when I say that I was keen to read this book given that it is a fictionalised account of the life of Vivian Maier.
Maier is, today, a well-known photographer, but in her lifetime no one but those immediately involved in her life knew about her image making. She was prolific, leaving a vast body of work (over 100,000 images). But the significance of her work was not realised until after she had died and, by this time, the huge collection of pictures had been broken up and sold in auction to pay the missed rental payments she owed for the storage facility where she kept the images. Sadly, the storage facility also held uncashed cheques the value of which would comfortably have paid off the rental debts.
This is not a conventional biography, though. The account of Maier’s life is related in a fragmentary fashion told by multiple narrators, including one called “Narrator”. Others we hear from include Vivian Maier herself, her mother (Maria) and one of her employers (she worked as a nanny and we hear from Sarah and Peter Rice and from their daughter Ellen whom Maier looked after). The Rice family are a fictional composite of various families for whom Maier worked. We also hear from Jeanne Bertrand, a portrait photographer with whom Maria and Vivian (and presumably influenced Vivan’s desire to take photographs). There are one or two other contributors.
It is the narrator known as Narrator who promises the most interesting side to the book. My frustration when reading was that this interaction between Narrator and Vivian doesn’t seem to develop much until the very final pages of the novel and this feels a bit like an opportunity missed. As we have it, Narrator intervenes in the text a few times but primarily to explain and only towards the end does Narrator begin to interact with Vivian (as in the quote at the start of this).
As a photographer it was also slightly frustrating to see so little in the book about photography, although I appreciate that more of this may well have made the book rather dull for non-photographers. Some of the comments about photography were sufficiently insightful to leave me, a photographer, wishing there was more:
“To photograph is to focus, and to focus is to exclude”.
(Since I stopped working for a living and started taking photographs for several hours a day, I have learned that the secret of a good photograph is often knowing what to leave out rather than what to put in).
“I wonder if it has a certain soothing effect through the viewfinder to see framed squares of the world?”
Maier comes across as a person who often struggles in her human relationships. Perhaps the camera is a means of hiding away, building a barrier against the world. It is certainly true that I have had to train myself to wait, often for a long time, before switching on the camera when I am out taking pictures. Holding the camera up to your eye certainly changes your engagement with the environment and I find it better to engage for a while before taking pictures.
I enjoyed the fragmented structure of this book. Several books I have read recently have included photographs and this seems a book that cries out for that kind of treatment. The narrative often refers to specific images taken by Maier and I made many trips out into the World Wide Web looking those up. I guess the absence of the pictures here is due to cost issues, unless it is simply that the author did not see the value of including them. I think some of the passages of the book would be more powerful if they included the image that the author clearly has in mind whilst writing. There is the possibility that this omission is a deliberate choice by the author given that Maier herself never saw many of the images she photographed because she didn’t have the films developed.
Overall, this was an interesting book to read with an enjoyable structure. 3.5 stars, rounded down for now.