I was given this book as a Xmas present from a friend who knows I love books and love physics and so he said finally there was a book that was all about why one loves physics - so perfect for me (and I do love being given books!).
I was so excited to start this - especially as it was sold as "love letters" to physics - so in my head I had these visions of chapters actually made up of love letters espousing why physics is like food for the soul. The reality though was a little less exciting and I actually found this all to easy to put down and had to force myself to read a chapter a day just to finish it.
Trying to pin point why I felt this way when I usually love these books is a bit tricky...this is what I have come up with:
1) I already love physics and my reasons why are actually quite different to the author. I actually think this book was more of an ode to engineering and human's application of physics as large chunks of this book were devoted to the voyager missions (seriously large chunks on this), LIGO, CERN and why these are interesting - I think the underlying physics (planetary sling shot, gravitational waves etc) is much more interesting and more of what I was expecting to be the focus. For example, the author was very enamored with little voyager endlessly traveling through deep space. While I am a big fan of what the voyager missions achieved (and are still achieving), I could pack a suitcase with some Earth memorabilia and throw it into space (with my uber super powers) at a little more than 11km/s and that suitcase is going to travel forever (collisions excepted which, based on probability, is highly unlikely). I am not sure why Voyager in deep space occupied such a large chunk of this book. I think the notion of being able to use nothing more than Newton's Laws to sling shot between planets due to alignment so much more interesting. The reality is, I don't really find engineering applications interesting. It is not my thing. Understanding the rules that govern our universe - well that is one thing....but human manipulation of those rules - yeah not so much.
2) This book really jumped a lot. Maybe it was because I kept switching off - but the fast paced switching was a bit much. I wanted it to slow down and let the ideas develop a little slower (like all good love affairs). This is physics to me.
3) In parts this seemed a bit pretentiously name dropping (but in this case - subject dropping) with the author constantly trying to bring in art, literature, religion, history references - but some of it just seemed like it was crammed in for the sake of being crammed in to show knowledge rather than to highlight the beauty in physics. The "physics" which should have been the focus got lost behind a lot of other things....
Don't get me wrong - any book on science/physics for the masses is one I am going to get behind and the author of this is obviously very intelligent, writes really well, is very passionate and the book is a mark of their insight and their love for the field. So why I didn't agree so much with what he chose to highlight a truly brilliant and diverse field, I respect his vision for this book and respect the intention of science for the masses.